Cerulean
Member

Registered: Dec 1999
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 289 |
It really depends on what your expecting the server to accomplish.. I have my system @ home setup as a development server which run Windows 2000, IIS5, ASP, PHP, Apache, MySQL, etc..etc.. on a Celeron 333 .. granted, its not ideal for a production server, but its pretty amazing how fast it responds considering all of the non-server specific services I run on it (I use it as my workstation as well)
If your planning on hosting mostly static pages on the server, I think what miradu recommended could work out just fine to start with (infact, I setup a web server similar (P2/266 w/256MB RAM, WinNT4)for a company for their customers .. a moderate level of traffic, mostly static, but works great and even on that system, virtually never goes about 10% CPU usage..
If you are wanting to do a dyanmic site (database backend, transactions, ssl, file sharing, streaming video/audio, etc..) then more power is better .. However, again, even for a site like this, if you are running a dedicated server for your medium traffic site, even what would be considered a low-end server (600mhz-1ghz processor, 256mb ram, 2x10GB HD, etc) would still probably be more than adaquate even when you have bursts of traffic .. (and I am guessing the limiting factor would be bandwidth limitations, not server processing power)
IF you can provide more information regarding the type of site you will be hosting on the server, where the server will be located (data center, business, home) and what type of bandwidth the server will have (modem, dsl, cable, t1, t3, oc-12 and up..) and any projected levels of traffic on the site (are you talking 5,000 hits per day? 50,000 hits per day? 500,000 hits per day?) then I (or someone else) could give you a better idea of what to look for in a server and what you may want to consider having on the server (for uptime requirements, optimizing for page load times, etc..)
Joe
|