tvt
Member
Registered: Dec 1999
Location:
Posts: 54 |
I always felt this:
If you were Palm, would you want to license your OS to some newer product and risk losing market share? Of course not, unless you had something new in the pipeline. So maybe Palm dictated, as part of the license agreement, that certain restrictions on the Visor be placed. A la non-upgradeable OS, reverse backlight, no rechargable battery, etc... whatever the shortcomings of the Visor are.
If you were to make a Visor from scratch, wouldn't you make it as good and "modern" as possible and all those above features in? How about instead of the "Visor Deluxe" having more memory and coming in iMac-esque colors, make the "normal Visor" like the deluxe visor now, and make the "Deluxe Visor" with all the spiffy features above?
The visor is a budget palm, with non budget features, but I see that when i show it to people. Show 'em a visor, and they look at it as if its _just_ another Palm. Show them a Palm Vx, and they diry their underwear. This is how Visor isnt taking away market share from Palm... inferior image...
I wonder what will happen when the Visor hits the stores. If HS doesnt get its customer support in check by then, Ill feel sorry for those who buy their Visor from Fry's...
Customer: "Excuse me, what's the difference between the Viz-oar and the Palm Five-ecks?"
Clerk: <Picks up the respective boxes and looks at the features"> ... (you can imagine how the rest of the conversation goes)
and then if it breaks and the customer has to go thru HS cust. support?! Wham! First Fry's, then HS... a consumer's worst nightmare.
|