Gameboy70
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: Metro Station, Hollywood and Highland
Posts: 1018 |
Actually, the whole point would be to have the Springboard carry the memory and processing load. You wouldn't be using your Visor's RAM, just the screen. This is the big disadvantage of CE's media player. It's a waste of the PDA's native resources. The Springboard bypasses that problem.
Why would anyone want to watch video on a Visor? More than a few people carry portable televisions the same size as the Visor. Granted, it's not for everyone, but so what? It's like saying, "Why would anyone pay $250 for an electronic organizer when they could buy a $10 paper one?" Now people do things with "organizers" that they would never have dreamed of.
You build the technology first, then the applications follow. As someone once said, "The computer is a solution looking for a problem." Essentially, what I'm after is Alan Kay's Dynabook concept; the only difference being that it fits in your shirt pocket instead of having notebook dimensions.
I think that Windows CE is a terrible implementation of a potentially fruitful idea: complete multimedia in a pocket-sized device. MS's mistake is to build all of this functionality right into the device when the state of the art is too primitive to make it useful. There's no point to playing MPEG clips if all you can watch is the trailer to "Phantom Menace."
The Springboard solves this problem by abstracting the processing and memory power needed to support multimedia to an independent layer (i.e. the module rather than the Visor itself). That way you can use your main memory to support bread and butter apps, but still support more resource-intensive media.
|