argent
Member

Registered: Jan 2000
Location:
Posts: 391 |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Handspring: Why have you forsaken us?
quote: Originally posted by Toby
OK, I obviously didn't get that across right. I wasn't saying that it would be impossible to port the springboard. I'm just dubious that Handspring has the motivation to do it at this point.
Well, that's obvious. It's been obvious for months that they have no motivation to do anything interesting with handhelds any more... they want to be competing in the cellphone business with Nokia and the other big boys who will proceed to eat their lunch.
The point I'm making is that the ARM processor and OS/4/5 are excuses for not doing something they don't want to do, not the motivation. It's like the promised OS upgrades: the lack of flash ROM is the excuse for not doing the upgrades... if they wanted to they could easily upgrade the OS in RAM, the way Palm did before the Palm III, the way Atari did on the Atari ST, the way Commodore did on the Amiga 3000... an OS is just software, it'll run out of RAM just fine. The OS itself is only about 400K, so you could even upgrade a 2M visor that way...
I don't see any reason to invent excuses for Handspring here. They have a plan, they're making decisions based on that plan, and that plan involves using the Visor as a JATO unit to get market share and then be abandoned. We know it, they've said it often enough, if their plan was to keep the Visor alive, they could do that as well... there's no technical problems with anything in their design that would prevent it.
I'm not saying they don't have a right to follow this plan or anything, either. It's just that *at the same time* you have to realise that the Visor and Treo are unrelated product lines that might as well be from different companies, and looking at the Treo 90 as a "replacement" for any Visor model is, well, seriously missing the boat.
__________________
Rev. Peter da Silva, ULC<br>
<a href=http://www.taronga.com/~peter/>Ar rug t� barr�g ar do mhact�re inniu?</a>
|