BobbyMike
Member

Registered: Dec 1999
Location: "Children are a gift from God, they are a reward"
Posts: 1049 |
quote: Originally posted by clulup So first you wound and kill lots of civilians for the public good, and then you do close to nothing to help those people after you have "freed" them? Really bad luck that the US signed the Geneva Convention, meaning that they agreed that the occupying force is responsible for the wellbeing of the people in the occupied territory.
That means providing water, electricity, etc. Looting by the civilian population isn't covered. Looting by the occupying forces is.
I guess when Saddam was in charge it was lucky for him he didn't have to operate under the Geneva Convention towards his people. Left him free to murder 400,000 (conservative) of his "Beloved People".
-Maybe they were there to secure the paperwork for the French oil deals. Most likey they were there to prevent the destruction of the infrastructure for the oilfields by pro-Saddam forces, as they weren't able to destroy the actual oilfields like they planned.
Would so many civilians been injured and killed if Saddam hadn't pulled his forces into the cities to try and protect them (the forces, not the civilians?)
Any loss of life is horrible, but the negative spinsters can't hide the fact that there has been a surprisingly small amount of civilians killed and wounded compared to any other conflict.
quote: Originally posted by yardie
This does not mean that the war was/is right.
Besides, there is no difference between Saddam's palaces and the slums around, and Manhattan and the slums around it.
What are you smoking? Do you hate the US so much?
I think the average income in the US is a tad bit higher than in Iraq.
And all this hand wringing about the looting thing is a bit silly. These people were suppressed for about a quarter of a century. Longer than a lot of us posting here have been alive. They have a little bit of repressed anger to let out.
The coalition forces have to worry about sabotage and suicide attacks. Who really cares if someone steals marble off a palace wall?
I, for one, don't want to see Marines shooting civilians for stealing furniture.
Doyou think the US should be shooting looters?
- And is it smart to let the Iraqi police back in charge (to keep the peace)? Since many of them were/are Saddam loyalists, could they be trusted?
__________________
"I am a debtor both to Greeks and to Barbarians, both to the wise and to the foolish."
|