I did some PalmOS doodling of my own for a graphics tutorial... and I have a sneaking suspicion that it just might have occurred to somebody else before me to draw pictures in a Palm paint program. Call me crazy. So what makes this art? The mind-numbing repetition, or the innocent 2-year old crayon scribble aesthetic?
Please, don't let's start with the "Sure, everyone comes out of the woodwork saying 'I could have done that' but he actually did it so therefore it's art" crap. I could have spent a couple of days scribbling on a Palm V to make Art with a capital "A", but it never occurred to me to do bring such a tired, pretentious concept to fruition. I guess I need to hang out in galleries more.
__________________
<br>"Form follows function - that has been misunderstood. Form and function should be one, joined in a spiritual union" -Frank Lloyd Wright
10-30-2000 10:52 PM
homer
Member
Registered: Jan 2000
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 1683
Usonian:
You have a point. It IS art, though. Art is entirely in the eye of the beholder.
I certainly wouldn't call it GOOD art, or even vaguely interesting art, either. I agree, it's a shallow, rather monotous piece. The only thing it has going for it is the gimmick factor, IMO.
__________________
We're all naked if you turn us inside out.
-David Byrne
10-30-2000 11:09 PM
Taki
Member
Registered: Jan 2000
Location:
Posts: 219
I think pieces in this page by a Taiwanese calligrapher deserve to be called "art".
__________________
Taki
<!-- Begin UMSB Link --><A HREF="http://www.ad-visor.net/UMSB/"><IMG SRC="http://www.ad-visor.net/image/UMSB.gif"ALT="UMSB"BORDER=0></a><!-- End UMSB Link -->
10-31-2000 02:28 AM
Vinny
Member
Registered: Mar 2000
Location: NC, Indiana
Posts: 465
Geez. I don't think I can do kanji that well with a brush . I gotta try this!