bkbk
Member
Registered: Jun 2000
Location:
Posts: 594 |
In response to your query, and w/apologies to the original poster (and God forbid if I'm a hair off topic, eh?), but what do you say we:
STOP ALL PURCHASING OF HS' 8MB MODULE.
...and, in fact, I'd recommend:
RETURN IT NOW, IF IT'S STILL UNDER WARRANTY.
1) After all, at this point (w/a number of people developing CF Card solutions, SBs) HS' 8MB is "last year's tech";
2) Proprietary; CF is not;
3) HS has recently made it PRETTY CLEAR that they are NOT OUR FRIENDS. Poor QA on their high-priced, not-so-great-value (esp. when compared w/the early Visors) new Visors. I'll assume you know the details. Some cust. svc. psnl. are even rude when asked about QA issues! NO RF SHIELDING??? ONLY YADA YADA WIRELESS IF YOU OWN AN EARLY VISOR? (I got a rude HS cust. svc. resp. to a polite [I swear] query about this. And Yada Yada was not so hot, either.)
4) Support our own developers from the larger Visor community. I believe they have shown, w/out exception as far as I know of, they are BETTER at cust. svc., info., responsiveness ... you name the issue. And, "supposedly" (to use a sports analogy) they are only "semi-pro"!
5) While it is "not legally incumbent upon them," I don't see HS getting after those vendors who have either majorly disappointed, infuriated (you sure are right if you think I'm thinking: INNOGEAR) or even outright screwed large numbers of us, on our behalf. (While the recent idea for "their stamp of approval" is a good one [if ripped off from Palm, which is ok, esp. since JH started it], I think it's sadly high time for them to add a "Hall of Shame.")
6) W/these "semi-pro" solutions, not only does your cost-per-Mb go way up, but so does the potential limit of Mb on your device.
I doubt many were bigger fans of JH, DD and the whole HS dream when they began. But I feel we have now cut them a year's worth of slack.
It's time to strike back.
At least in this relatively minor way -- though I believe they will receive the message loud and clear.
|