news | articles | reviews | software | modules | accessories | discussion | faq | mobile | store
VisorCentral.com >> Discussion >> Visor Models >> Visor & Deluxe
Visor 50% faster than Palm V?

Post a New Thread | Post A Reply

  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Topic: Visor 50% faster than Palm V?    
Visory
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 15

Question

Downloaded Benchamark tonight and checked out how fast my VDX is ... It came out at 158% (compared to Palm V's 100%)!

Can that be correct?


... download Benchmark here for free: http://www.palmgear.com/software/sh...amp;prodID=2864

Visory is offline Old Post 10-31-1999 07:39 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for Visory Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
HipHop
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 200

Post

Visor uses 'CruiseControl', you can install it in you Palm V and use it with the same result.

HipHop is offline Old Post 10-31-1999 09:27 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for HipHop Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
emeyer
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsford,NY,USA
Posts: 223

Post

That's correct ... Handspring optimized performance by removing some unnecessary wait states. Supposedly these were passed on to Palm and they have done the same optimizations in PalmOS 3.3. (Unconfirmed)


------------------
-Eric
VisorCentral Staff

emeyer is offline Old Post 10-31-1999 11:18 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for emeyer Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
JHromadka
VisorCentral Staff

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Texan in Calgary for a while
Posts: 1361

Post

There has been no evidence that Handspring uses overclocking to speed up the Visor -- they optimized the code.

I ran Benchmark before and after I upgraded my Palm III to OS 3.3, and both have it at 91%. I haven't seen the numbers yet on a Palm Vx, which uses a 20MHz processor.

------------------
James Hromadka
VisorCentral.com
Personal Website: http://www.geocities.com/jehromadka

JHromadka is offline Old Post 10-31-1999 05:16 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for JHromadka Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
jonpod
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location:
Posts: 61

Post

I am under the impression that OverClocking and removing or reducing the wait states are two different things.

My understanding is the losing or reducing wait states (i.e. "optimizing the code") make the 16 mHz Dragonball go faster - 150% vs. the regular 100%. While over clocking can move the mHz of the processor up to 27 or 29 mHz with Afterburner (which doesn't currently work with OS 3.3).

I could be wrong about all of this but this is the way I understand it.

jonpod

jonpod is offline Old Post 10-31-1999 10:43 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for jonpod Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
HipHop
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 200

Post

I upgraded my IIIx a few days ago to 3.3. I can't tell the difference. But then I never had a speed problem before....

I believe as long as you use the normal applications it's fast eneugh.

Where do you need the speed?

HipHop is offline Old Post 11-01-1999 01:30 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for HipHop Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
dragon
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: chicago,illinois,usa
Posts: 9

Post

i noticed a big difference from OS 3.0-3.3 on my palm iii. I have a lot of hacks running in the background and my finance database took forever to load. My girlfriend thinks that using my Palm III is just as bad as using some Windows CE machines because it takes a while to do anything on it (1-2 extra seconds)

I can tell the performance difference in os 3.3, and afterburner 2.0 works with it also, but ecohack does not.

dragon is offline Old Post 11-01-1999 04:29 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for dragon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
rsperko
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 74

Post

I have gotten really inconsistent results from that benchmark program when removing wait states using Afterburner 2.2. Sometimes my old IIIx would come up faster than everything, then I would go into Afterburner, speed up the processor and my benchmark would go down. Never able to recreate the same results consistently when changing wait states and processor speed.

rsperko is offline Old Post 11-01-1999 01:42 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for rsperko Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:32 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
[ Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread ]

Forum Jump:

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.4
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.