everything's a blur
Member
Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 47 |
Re: GSM coverage may be spotty
quote: Originally posted by AndrewB
As the VisorPhone will be using GSM for it's mobile capabilities, anyone have any idea about coverage areas for GSM?
I use PacBell Wireless for my mobile phone. It uses GSM technology. There are some major US cities where I can't use my phone. I'm not sure if that's because there are no GSM providers in the area, or if PacBell Wireless hasn't made an agreement with a provider in the area.
This spottiness has led me to consider getting a CDMA phone from a national provider like Sprint PCS or Verizon Wireless. At least this way, I should be reachable all the time on one phone. But with a VisorPHone, this may be difficult to accomplish.
I find GSM coverage in major cities is pretty good. I live in Toronto and have had flawless roaming coverage in Montreal, New York City, Chicago, San Francsico, LA, and Newark. The problem with GSM support in North America is that there is only coverage in metropolitan areas, and not a lot of GSM phones are dual-mode (which I find weird).
My provider (Fido, by Microcell Solutions) provides seemless roaming coverage in major cities throughout Canada, so I can up and go whenever I want to unlike my friends and coworkers who use CDMA or TDMA phones (they've got to call their provider to tell them where they are going and get access there as well as roaming numbers). When I travel to the US, I just tell them where I'm going and they tell me who my provider will be and how much they charge. I always hated travelling with my friends' CDMA phones... =)
In the US, there are SO many providers, I guess that would explain why coverage is spotty. Check around the net to find providers for the areas you go. The only areas on Fido's US roaming map not currently serviced are St. Louis, Green Bay, New Orleans, and Mobile. Perhaps it is all just a matter of contracts between providers.
|