flips13
Member

Registered: Apr 2001
Location: 'braska
Posts: 211 |
Re: however.
quote: Originally posted by NeilMcD
Except for the US Government and other disability-related organizations, almost EVERY site out there has so many tags and useless FLASH junk or images that a blind person using their "screen readers" gets treated a lot of gibberish BEFORE they even get to the actual meat of the site.
The most recently released version of Flash (plugin 6 / MX for development) is supposed to address some of these issues. While I do not know the details (I don't work with Flash much), I know this is one of the main reasons for developers to upgrade.quote: This would be GREAT for the web industry.. web developers would have more work to do thus more jobs for them!
Trust me, web developers have plenty to do, they have all the work that their former coworkers were doing . There in lies part of the problem, the economics of accessibility. Some companies who are hard pressed for resources may have a hard time justifying using those resources to make their materials available to a relativly small set of users. It takes either a company that has a strong moral obligation to accessibility (in which case they are probably not hurting for resources) or there is a mandate by the the customer that these issues be addressed. This is the case with the Federal Government, and why the we pay $800 for toilet seats.
Being a developer, I try to take accesibility into everything that I do, but it is something of a moving target. Two years ago it was making descriptions for your images, today it is much more confusing. With the W3C recomendations now available, hopefully we can move on from here.
__________________
www.jphillips66.org
|