brijoco
Member
Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Indy
Posts: 38 |
I ended up with a photojournalism degree from college, and just happened to be flipping thru when I saw that show. So I stuck around and watched most of it with a bad taste in my mouth.
The paparazzi have stained a honorable craft.
I think Princess Diana's death has dramatically heightened the awareness of stalk-arazzi photographers (still and video). People are becoming much less tolerant of their collective indiscretion. There's a blatant disregard for the human code of conduct in that "profession".
Woody Harrelson (Cheers, White Men Can't Jump) punched a photographer because the guy wouldn't stop taking pictures of his daughter. I'd be pissed, too.
I've heard that the term "paparazzi" means insect or pest in Italian. How apropos is that? =)
They've given the entire craft a bad image ... I work for a major metro daily newspaper (no longer as a photographer) ... Shooters today are on even par with lawyers: would you trust either? No. It shouldn't be that way.
Pro photogs can take pictures that bring you to tears, or make you burst with laughter, or help you see the injustice in someone's eyes. They take pristine landscapes, wonderfully artistic portraits and more.
They SHOW you emotion. They humanize a topic.
The aren't paparazzi.
Phew! Sorry for the rant. It's been a bad day at the office and this ended up being my outlet!
Maybe I'll zap my PortaMonkey ... that always helps!
[Edited by brijoco on 10-20-2000 at 12:00 PM]
__________________
<br><img src="http://brian.covert.net/pix/sitepix/sig.jpg" border="0">
|