Toby
Member
Registered: Jul 2000
Location:
Posts: 3034 |
quote: Originally posted by mrjoec
Actually, I can see the original poster's point of view.
I think price drops are a bad thing when they happen every other week. It's just bad marketing.
It seems to be prevalent in the home computer/electronics space. If you buy a home computer, I'd expect it to be priced less within two weeks.quote: The last thing you ever want to do is make your current customers feel ripped off. When you drop a price once after a product has been out for a long time (six months or more), people accept that. Sure, there are a few late comers who bought at the higher price yesterday, but those are few and far between. You haven't bought anything from someone like Dell recently, have you? I get prices from them fairly often at work, and I've had price drops of a few hundred dollars from one week to the next.quote: At least the early adopters can feel as if they were ahead of the game for six months or so. Most companies will offer price protection within 10 days for folks who just bought something that is now marked down, anyway. It doesn't strike me that such a thing would make good business sense, and that's coming from someone who was an early adopter of the Edge. I don't feel ripped off by them dropping the price. I feel more ripped off because they couldn't think of a simple thing like static electricity being the most likely cause for its early problems.quote: When you drop the price, and then drop it again a few weeks later, however, you make a lot more people upset. All the people who were waiting for that price drop and then bought now feel like you're jerking them around. You also scare investors and potential customers away, because they think you'll just keep dropping the prices. If Dubinsky hadn't made the silly statement she did at that earnings call, I'd bet that the current speculation would be running rampant about Handspring's redoing their entire line in color. Until then, their stock was coming back from the toilet like gangbusters. Even as it is, it's still 2-3 times better off than it was before the Treo announcement.quote: Even if you're dropping the prices on several items, it's best to do them all at once, and only once. Then there are no questions about whether you'll do it again. There also won't be as much rampid speculation as to whether or not you're about to release new models. Or maybe they need to just do like Sony and retire their models every three months or come out with new models yearly like car manufacturers?quote: Speaking of which, it's a similar situation with new models of products. I work at the Apple Store part time, and you'd be amazed at how many people expect Apple to release a flat panel iMac with an even bigger screen in the next few months. I wouldn't be surprised to see one by Christmas time.quote: I keep telling them they're out of their minds, but they don't want to listen. Why would a company want to take preorders for over 150,000 new computers, and then release an even better version a few weeks later? Because they want to sell even more of them?quote: One, the current product is selling, so there's no need to give anyone incentive to buy. Huh? Apple claims to want to target people who don't own Macs. To do that you _need_ to give the people that aren't buying your current line an incentive to buy.quote: Two, all the people who have bought want to feel like they have the best and brightest at least for a few months. Then why should they wait more than a few months to come out with something better? But seriously, do you think anyone is getting an iMac to be the 'best and brightest'? Wouldn't they get a G4 if that were the case?quote: [...] I think it's time we started requiring Business 101 in most high school curriculums. It would be a lot easier for companies to make money and therefore keep making great products if they didn't have to fight consumer ignorance on a regular basis. You're not talking about Business 101 issues, though. You're talking more about psychological issues (at best marketing).quote: And no, by the way, this isn't the friendliest of forums in which to participate. But it's certainly not the worst, either. I can see why some people would be discouraged from posting here, for fear of criticism. But that's the nature of forums, isn't it? Umm...that's life, isn't it? If you're going to live your life in fear of criticism and never participate in a group, then why is that someone else's fault?quote: The people who are willing to hoist their opinions strongly, ( i.e. the ones who fake the most confidence), soon take over the show, while others who may have valid points but are afraid to be forceful get shut out. There's nothing you can really do about that. It's social darwinism. It's how the world is run. Yeah, so either speak your piece or suck up and deal. It has nothing to do with fake confidence. It has to do with belief in what you have to say. If it's a valid point, then say it. I would believe more that fear of having an invalid point preventing someone from posting may be more their better judgement stopping them from speaking an invalid one.quote: I'm not saying that anyone here is really nasty, or anything. dick-richardson is. He's a baaaaadd boy.quote: I don't think anyone here is. But there's definitely a "you're wrong, and I'm going to tell you why" kind of aggression that the average person would be turned off by. How is that aggression? If I believe that you're wrong, then I'm going to tell you why. You may agree. You may disagree. You get your chance to either clarify why you were really right, or clarify why my refutation is wrong. It's called an exchange of ideas. If someone can't handle that, then maybe they should find another forum where the mods never let anyone disagree.quote: The bottom line is that most people aren't strong enough to stand by their own opinions, so they get put down easily. Then maybe they need to reinforce their nerve and their argument?quote: And some people (not all, but some) take advantage of that ease by jumping at every opportunity to prove someone wrong. What's wrong with that if they're wrong?quote: Even when they don't mean to. If they don't mean to, then how would they be doing it too aggressively? Aggressiveness would imply actual intent to me.quote: I say to xeyeder that you should keep posting anyway. Sure.quote: No one here is an expert on anything. How would you know?quote: Otherwise we'd have better things to do with our time. What could be a 'better' use of an 'expert''s time than sharing it with others?quote: Don't let anyone push you around. Here, or anywhere else. Strongly seconded.  quote: Chances are, people aren't intending to be so forceful. They're just passionate about their opinions. And some of them will even back them up with real facts.
|