dkessler
Member

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Plant City, FL
Posts: 385 |
From a technical standpoint, CompactFlash can do almost everything Springboard can. The only things it doesn't support are on-board plug-and-play driver software (which was a nice Springboard idea but it ties the card to a specific CPU and OS) and an "open" form-factor. The open form factor was also a nice Springboard idea "on paper" but in reality, going beyond the standard size module caused incompatibility with aftermarket carrying cases and made users much less likely to accept the module. CF gets around the form-factor constraints by adding "blobs" onto the end of the card. Not quite as elegant as the Visor's open-back solution, but equally effective (and problematic).
Unfortunately, all PalmOS device makers except Handera have rejected CF because of size and power requirements. CF is much more common in PocketPC and Linux based handhelds. CF cards exist for memory, wired ethernet, Bluetooth, 802.11, modems, GPRS, serial ports, etc. Granted I've seen no "personal massager" CF cards - but I'm not sure that's a bad thing You're also unlikely to find anyone developing MP3 CF cards since the majority of PDAs that take CF can already handle multimedia internally. But the CF interface would "support" the development of such devices just as the Springboard slot did.
__________________
<ul><li>Dave Kessler<br>President - Kopsis, Inc.</li></ul>
|