bblue
Member

Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Prison
Posts: 421 |
Well
Actually, I'm NOT sidestepping initial development costs all too much. (Although, depending on its development process, it could be slightly higher) The Base model CAN be cheap because it requires no additional screen to be developed. It already exists, thus once it is figured out how to get it through the Springboard & have it daisychained, software is really the only other part of this that will be a toughy. The costs on this simply depends on the developers. This is why I think Handspring itself would be the best company to make this, simply because they would understand their own technology better than some 3rd party company.
The one thing that would hinder costs is how soon the company wants to cover development costs. This would appeal to users who would LIKE to have color when they would use it, without having to shell out the cash for a whole-new PDA. As dumb as it sounds, there ARE people, and quite a few of them I shall add, who don't have $449 to shell out for a new PDA when all they want is a color screen.
The intermediate model is the one that would cause some trouble, since it would require its own screen to be developed. The High-end one would probably base its screen off of the color HandEra development.
Anybody who owns a laptop (no G4 owners, though) who plugs it in to another monitor for better viewing would know why such a device would be a necessity! The only difference, is that THIS you can take with you. Not to mention, something the thickness of the Edge (proposed) would not hurt the form factor on the Visor.
Ok, now for the problem that I think WILL be the toughest to deal with: the daisy chaining.
I think you misunderstood me about the Edge's expansion port. It's not daisy chained, but I'm wondering if it could be. Such technologies as the MiniJam and Memplug have already proven that Springboards CAN handle separate expansion (especially the MiniJam!) on top of the current Springboard module. However, this would break new ground, since no other technology supports Springboard modules. The first problem (the only real big one) is power.
This could be solved by:
* Adding alternative batteries to the screen, making it self powered.
* Adding battery power to the Springboard sled adapter.
Now there are obvious disadvantages I'm sure you all know from these. But hey, it's a concept!
Of course, the higher end models would probably be the ones that would bring the total Visor's cost over a Prism, but these would also be MUCH better screens, so that's not such a problem.
--------
If anyone has any sugguestions about development (power, features, etc.) I'd love to hear them. So far, the only stuff I've added has been what my tiny brain can come up with.
Once again, I think this is still a feasible idea, but I think the more important part now is its execution, which if done right, could get it within the desired price range.
---
Advantages over Prism: (Proposed Basic Model)
* Can be used on any Visor
* Can be removed, so when you want to keep your battery life strong / don't want the minimal bulk added, you don't.
* Current Visor owners will not have to buy a new PDA
* Platinum + VisorScreen = Less or equal to Prism.
* Can run Non-color apps (when screen is removed.. duh!)
* When in would offer larger Silkscreen (your Visor's original screen)
* Color screen can be transported to any Visor you're using.
Disadvantages:
*Possibly larger form factor than Prism
*Not integrated (this is a matter of opinion)
*Requires adapter for Springboard Modules
*Possible same cost
--------------------------------
That's pretty much it.
__________________
<b><font size=1 color=teal>"Sorry about the whole thing about losing your life savings, but that Palmpilot is property of Enron, so please give it back"
|