BobbyMike
Member

Registered: Dec 1999
Location: "Children are a gift from God, they are a reward"
Posts: 1049 |
heh...I wanted to confirm this before going on memory, but in fact he _was_. The lifetime acheivement award was obviously for a body of work, but Miles' Grammies are as follows:
Thanks for the info. I was only aware of the three following albums:
Miles Ahead (album issued 1954) award given in 1994
Sketches of Spain (album issued 1959) award given in 1997
and
Porgy and Bess (album issued 1958) award given in 2000
(all with Gil Evans)
I don't catch any humor in it.
Too bad. It was funny.
No, that's not mainstream. That's called being a poseur. It's also considered fighting words in some circles that I used to frequent.
Almost the same thing. Mainstream means least possible denominator thinking (ie. "everything else likes it so I should too.") while a poseur "likes" something because he/she thinks other people will think he/she is cool/hip/etc.
Which is where the before-mentioned joke came from. You have proved yourself the opposite many different times.
If I called you a poseur it would still be considered fighting words where I came from.
So, because Lou Reed received a contemporary Grammy for one of his works, that means any different?
With the point I was trying to get across, yes. You don't seem to think it was a valid point. I don't have enough energy to try and word it differently.
Yes, and Joan Jett didn't get into it until that time.
Actually she (among other indie producers) was one of the reasons punk became marketable. She didn't "jump onto a bandwagon" as much as see an emerging trend and promote it through the groups she produced. She also produced the Chemical Brothers and other interesting groups before they were "big".
Punk attitudes _reek_ of zealotry.
Almost all musical attitudes reek of zealotry. That's because beneath their skins they're mostly just opinion - which can't be "proved" to someone else. It's always either you get it or you're a dork.
It makes my skin itch.
It's obvious you've not hung around with punks for extended periods of time if you don't consider punk a religion
Actually I did. Only the art school intellectual poseurs considered it a religion. They all eventually left and went to law school, became dentists or doctors.
That's the funny thing. In today's society, to be 'mainstream' _is_ to be different. Everybody and their brother is getting ink or piercing something. None of those different groups stops being a group just because they're not like another group. They're all stereotypes. Finding a different stereotype doesn't make one unique.
I agree totally.
Hence my point. The original punks would have considered such a thing excommunicable.
Heh... I like ti think that they would actually have tried figuring out how they could do the same thing so they could get a chance to piss on a table during a big hollywood meeting. The original punks were so far removed from what we saw here in the USA it's almost impossible to imagine their attitudes. What we got here were mostly what you would call poseurs because they left punk when it became unfashionable.
__________________
"I am a debtor both to Greeks and to Barbarians, both to the wise and to the foolish."
|