septimus
VisorCentral Staff

Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Them Twin Cities
Posts: 1758 |
quote: Originally posted by BobbyMike
You're making this a bit too simplistic also. The Admin. hasn't said that this wasn't really about WMD or terrorist links.
quote: "We were not lying," said one official. "But it was just a matter of emphasis."
uh huh. The oversimplification is that we could invade, occupy, and then cause "democracy" to spead like wildfire in the middle east. (meanwhile, they erode and undercut it here).
quote: They have said that they think weapons have been moved and destroyed prior to the coalition forces moving in.
riiiiight. Becuase they had so much time to do that, right? You can't make a nuke in your basement, you know?
quote: Don't forget how long it took the US to establish a democratic form of government in Japan and Germany.
Right, because of things like the Marshall Plan, the Axis managed to rebuild their economy. What do you suppose the chances are that Iraq will get the equivalent sort of plan, given our *stelllar* history in aiding various arab peoples?
Additionally, the politics involved in forming a government in Iraq are too complex for me to figure out--but given teh variously opposed groups there, I'd say we'd be better off splitting the country up into several diffferent parts--which would piss off surrounding countries to no end.
quote: That was nice article too. Unfortunately there weren't any actual quotes, just unnamed sources. ( "What experts?" "Top experts.")
*shrug* That's one of the ways that modern gov'ts (especially this one) do PR, via leaks. The leak here is to test the water, see how everybody reacts before it becomes the party line.
quote: As to the Empire theory. What would be the purpose?
That's a good question. I can't be sure, because it seems to ridiculous to me. but given that people like Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld have been planning this for over 10 years I have a hard time coming to any other conclusion. I think it's about stabilizing through force We don't want a literal empire, I suppose, but something like it, like hegemony. I guess "empire" is a nasty term for "forceful unilateralism," only it's not just that we're acting alone, but that we're making everyone else act with us.
..so, then we get back to the fact that Saddam et al was a terrible dictatorship. Yes. But if that's why you're invading, say so from the get go. Why didn't they--because that's not the only reason we're invading (otherwise why haven't we invaded tibet, myanmar, china, several african nations, and so on). What else is it? Again, all I can come up with is some sort of exertion of power and might in order to show the world who's boss - and I think "empire" is a good a word for that as any.
quote: I think that having a democratic republic smack dab in the middle of all those dictators and theocracies will be destabilizing factor
that was my point about Rumsfeld's quote. If we really set up a democracy there, there's a good chance that they'd vote in all those theocratic clerics. So then what?
quote: The world has moved beyond the Empire stage.
tell that to [insert your oppressed country/people of choice here]. I think that the move toward globalization is something very much like empire, though at least with globalization there's less raping and pillaging. Seriously, beyond empire? That's an oversimplification.
quote: The only people I see trying to build an Empire is the UN and it's been pretty clear it's ALL about the money for that organization. But then again,I could be wrong
??What?? The UN is an imperial force insofar as it is the tool of the security council. Certainly not in and of itself. And all about the money? I guess you'll have to explain that to me, because I'm absolutely at a loss as to what that refers to. Their budget is a pittance compared to ours (and so is the relatively massive amout we owe them). I don't think anybody can say that there is a single other organization on the face of the earth that is more about the money than the US Gov't right now.
__________________
Don't like somebody? Click "Profile" on a post and then click "Ignore "so and so's" posts". Voila!
|