hmp32
Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: I think I want to live in Germanium when I grow up
Posts: 29 |
quote: Originally posted by dietrichbohn
Athlon v Athlon XP v P4 v p3: WTF?
and of course the moral question: Win 98 or Win XP? Stability or purity? If I'm damned for using Windows, shoun't I just be doubly damned?
Windows 98SE (note that Windows 98 Second Edition
is MUCH different that the non-SE version in terms of hardware
support).
Overall, I would put forth this issue:
Any Windows OS not going to be a good platform for Data Security. NOTE: I mean data security by the following definition:
"Allowing access of data to those that need it when they need it."
By this definition, Windows will NEVER be secure, or at the
very least, it is a very difficult OS to secure. That includes,
but is not limited to, classical ideas of cracking (otherwise
mislabeled to the lay public as hacking), your Web browser
providing info you don't want it to, applications reporting on
your OS even if you don't want it to, viruses, Trojan horse, stable support for hardware, etc.
All computer security in the sense most people mean it, is how do you restrict access to data to a give set of people.
Now, Windows 98SE has the benefit that most of the major
problems have been worked out, I personally would trust the virus scanners on it, and there is more information on how to "secure" the system and more experience in doing so than XP.
Windows 2000 is more or less the same as 98SE above in
terms of being a "known" quantity. However, it can be made more secure, more easily than Win 98SE.
It has Direct 8.X support, and most hardware that is support by WIndows 98SE is supported by W2K as well. I would encourage you to think about Windows 2000 as an option. Like UNIX, Windows 2000 is a security hole if you do everything as root(UNIX)/administrator with absolute power(windows).
But, if you setup a W2K user account with restricted access to OS functions, you limit your vulnerabilities to nefarious software. And besides, your wife can have her own account, then you can hide
your porn from her with W2K as long as she doesn't have admin access 
XP, like the Treo, is the latest, greatest promise. But is there
really any software out there that is XP only that you think you
are going to need for the next 2 years?
The downside of both XP and W2K in respect to Admin controls of the system, is they do take a little more time to manage and some
applications are a little harder to setup correctly under a multiuser
environment.
Also, don't underrate a CDRW. It can backup your critical data
and save you lots of pain.
-henry
|