Vinny
Member

Registered: Mar 2000
Location: NC, Indiana
Posts: 465 |
Agreed
I have to agree with you Sanchan. There are, however, many people who don't own any modules where this would be just fine. Although anyone who frequently uses different modules will definitely want to take this into consideration. If having your cover go all the way to the back is something that's very important to you than this is the obvious choice over the competitor's product.
Personally, I don't use any modules right now (although I hope to soon... are you listening Santa? ), but I still prefer the non module-dependent nature of the competitor's product. I also don't like the idea of having to modify a module. The system is definitely an intelligent one and well thought out it seems, but there is modification required to springboards you own just to have a cover with all the way folding lid. Having to certify springboards as "Flipped" and modifying a noncompatible springboard so that you can use your lid is a little extreme just to have foldback capability.
I personally prefer the competitor's product for reasons beyond the springboard modifications required. These reasons are backwards compatiblity with PalmIII lids, pretty inexpensive (I'm not sure what the FlipCover will go for, probably near the same price), lids are available from the manufacturer in a plethora of color matched lids, and compatiblity with oversized springboards (however, the VisorPhone will require slight machining modification I understand).
If you don't use springoboards (which is one of the major factors people buy Handspring rather than Palm), then this may be a better solution, featuring a completely folding lid. However I don't believe the ends were worth the means in my own personal opinion unless this is a killer feature to the buyer.
[Edited by Vinny on 12-18-2000 at 05:04 PM]
__________________
-Vincent
|