Soul Raven
Member

Registered: Dec 1999
Location:
Posts: 239 |
Well, it looks like the Texas contingent is checking in. I live in San Antonio, so I thought I would save ChrisB and JH a trip and checked out the Alamo myself.
I have it on the best authority that the Alamo is completely Y2K compliant, and the Texas Department of Parks and Recreation see no problems with people remembering it well into the next millennium. Evidently things weren't so smooth with the Y1K conversion, though.
It seems that the Alamo is constructed from MUD (multi-user dirt) in program blocks called "bricks". They were assembled in cooperation with a company called "Adobe", but I didn't see a single laser printer the whole time I was there. Evidently, this MUD was only encoded with a 3-digit date field, and there were concerns that when the year went from 999 to 1000, the old dirt would not be able to interface with the new dirt, causing the bricks to loose cohesion and fall to the ground. However, the new year came and went, and there were no reports of building collapses, except some in northern Europe by the Saxons and Normans, but I have been assured that this was a separate issue and wholly unrelated to date formatting.
The Alamo, being sturdily constructed several hundred years later out of 4-digit-year compliant dirt, will remain solidly in place until December 31st, 9999, at which time it will explode.
I also heard rumors of Y0K problems, with documented earthquakes and floods, when the calendars had to stop counting down and start counting the years up as positive numbers. These rumors have mainly been associated with a SysAdmin named "Jesus" who was trying to update user manuals and FAQs to the latest version when some of the end-users who had taken one or two programming classes back in college thought they knew more than he did and tried to get him fired.
[This message has been edited by Soul Raven (edited 12-15-1999).]
|