dkessler
Member

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Plant City, FL
Posts: 385 |
Re: Huh?
quote: Originally posted by yardie
I thought that the cureccnt Springboard architecture is ainadequate for the use of CF/Type Ii devices? If it is not, how comes the devices now available will not work with the InnoPocket/Matchbook Drive adapter solutions?
Nope, it's the current adapter designs that are incompatible with CF+ cards. Granted, the Springboard slot is missing some key interface signals, but they can be synthesized from the existing signals using logic onboard the module (the same is not true for interfacing to PCMCIA cards which people are always asking us about). The downside is that the module is bigger, more power hungry, and significantly more expensive than the current crop of CF memory card adapters.
It's not certain that a CF+ adapter would be a viable product in the US because by the time you combine the cost of the module with the cost of the "interesting" CF+ cards, you could get a native Springboard module that does the same thing cheaper. However, in Japan where inexpensive NTT DoCoMo wireless CF+ cards are readily available, it's a different story 
__________________
<ul><li>Dave Kessler<br>President - Kopsis, Inc.</li></ul>
|