BizEchilD
Member
Registered: Oct 1999
Location: Columbus, Ohio USA
Posts: 255 |
I think there is no real determination why Compaqs suck so damn bad.. I had a k6-233 that sucked so bad I told my girlfriend I refused to let her use it. I gave it to my family instead (their old computer was a 386/16, so it would be a god compared to that).
I built a k6-2 450 with 128 megs of ram and it smokes. Beautiful machine, especially compared to the old one. TOday I'm putting together an Athlon 600 so we'll see what I say about compaqs then 
Actually, my friend has a k6-2 400 Compaq and mine completely KILLS it. I checked his system resources and he had about 68% free compared to my 90. Compaq loads TONS AND TONS AND TOOOONNNNNSSS of stuff when it boots up. Do Start->Run and type msconfig then go to the startup tab. I had to scroll through his forever whereas mine fits in one small space.
You should ONLY have things like taskbar, whatever mouse program you use, explorer.exe (or if you use litestep.exe or something similar) and that's pretty much it. Anything else kills resources and makes your computer run like a 486 again.
Compaqs are just piss poor quality wise (My buddy's computer also had a hard drive crash on day 3 of owning it and 3 months later his Mobo died). I built my own, saved some money, and got exactly what I wanted.. plus I learned a ton and am very happy for it. But, if you don't want to deal with that go with a better name brand company (NOT IBM or HP).. basically any company that uses standard, upgradable parts.
|