sdoersam
Member

Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, Maryland
Posts: 205 |
quote: Originally posted by Madkins007
.....
Question, though- if you were in that store and a shooting broke out and you were injured, wouldn't you (or your lawyer) be among the first to wonder (probably quite loudly) why they were not checking bags in this day and age?
For me, not particularly. Easier to hide the weapon on your person (ie bulky jacket, overcoat, shoulder holster, etc.) and much more accessable than to carry it in a bag. While I understand the theory of why store check bags, I don't think the expense (of both irritated customers and paying someone to check them) balances out the supposed prevented loss of pilfered items. Kind of like when some of the Health insurance industry started to realize that they spent more money reviewing and declining frivolous medical procedures then if they just paid for them to begin with.
As an example, during the past Christmas/New Years holidays, I went to a Walmart, walked in the door, saw a line that wrapped through the isles (at least 20 to 30 deep) of people that had bought electronics (paid for at the electronics are vs the front checkout lines), and were waiting to get out while their purchases were checked. I had stuff that I wanted to buy that day, but quickly turned around and left. I wasn't about to deal with that hassle. I went and bought the stuff somewhere else.
__________________
Sven
If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished.
|