foo fighter
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: I'm not sure, but I see lots of lights everywhere.
Posts: 1287 |
Homer:
No offense, but why do Mac users always use the BMW vs. Chevy argument to compare Macs to PCs? Totally irrelevant. Macs may be dead sexy, but the comparison ends there. What Mac users fail to point out is that both BMWs and Chevys all run on industry standard components (with a few exceptions), use industry standard fuels (Gasoline or Diesel), and use conventional oils for lubrication. The same metaphor can't be used for Macs and PCs. Macs run a proprietary OS (Yes, I know Windoze is a proprietary OS, but it is accepted as the "standard" and runs on a open-standard platform), on proprietary hardware. Would the BMW sell as well if it were powered by a special fuel that was rather expensive and difficult to find?
Different markets? Different niche maybe, but not different markets. Both Macs and PCs are "Personal Computers" targeted at consumers and professional users. The only difference between the two is their internal architecture, the fact that (unlike PCs) Macs are vertically integrated, and PCs have a much greater corporate presence. That's about it. Oh yah, and Macs have a loyal following of user who love their systems, which can't be said for PCs (believe me, I know). You'll never hear me say; "I love my DELL!", in fact I hate it! I'm sick of the ugly, clunky, tasteless beige tower.
Don't get me wrong, I am by no means a Mac basher, in fact I may yet purchase one. If Apple keeps the Cube at $1499 and throws some more goodies in, I may bite. I especially love the 15" LCD display, especially since Jobs lowered the price to $799.
As I said, no offense intended. I just wanted to throw in my opinion on the "BMW" argument. To each his own
__________________
My blog: Pocketfactory
|