Fat_Man
Member

Registered: Dec 2000
Location:
Posts: 384 |
I've got one
I brought the QuickLink pen about two months ago. Got it from Amazon.com for $128. I think that the QuickLink pen is very useful. It makes input of info. into the Visor a lot faster. The pen can scan a variety of font sizes. It's recognition very pretty good, but sometimes it does fail. I would estimate that the accuarcy is about 90%. The funny thing is that I think the quicklink has an internal word bank that sometimes get activate when it cannot recognize a word because sometimes when I scan medical text, I would get a word that is completely wrong. Other time if it cannot recognize a word, it would just leave a (~) in place of the letter it failed to recognize. There's also a sight lag time for the processor to recognize the scanned text, lag time is not very long hardly noticable.
The beaming of info. to the Visor is very simple. I have not use the direct to PC scan yet. I carry the Quicklink in my white coat pocket. I would scan my patient's lab reports, pathology finding, and past medical histories, beam the info. to the visor's memo. pad, and from there tranfer the info. to my patientkeeper.
Overall, I think the Quicklink is very useful for what I do. I would recommend it.
__________________
Fat's
|