Toby
Member
Registered: Jul 2000
Location:
Posts: 3034 |
quote: Originally posted by Madkins007
Sorry- my wife is not in town this week to ask, but I will! I DID notice that I dropped a line out of my post as I was editing it (don't you hate it when that happens?) to the effect of how no two history books ever seem to agree on anything!
On analysis, I find that understandable, however, when they disagree on the basic facts, I hold them both in question.quote: As to the requirments getting progressively harder- is this the cause or the effect? Biology has been taught first for so long (IF the 'alphabetical order' bit has merit) that the standards may simply have been writen to be easier. Actually, biology is a very complicated science- IF you covered the complicated areas, which schools around here do not. Sure, they could cover more complicated things, but at what point in a biology curriculum is the math going to get harder than chemistry or physics? Biology at a layman's level is going to require very little (if any) math. It's more geared towards understand systems of classification. Chemistry, even at it's most basic levels, is going to require an understanding of algebra. Physics will require a bit higher understanding of math.quote: All the sciences are pretty large fields- and we do not and cannot cover them all in the time alloted in school. Since there is already some picking and choosing going on, perhaps the selections have been weighted so things build on one another- which would be a perfectly logical way to do it, and could probably be done about as well no matter what the order of the sciences offered was. Except that one can't cover even a basic level of chemistry without algebra. One also can't cover a basic level of physics without understanding more advanced maths.quote: You guys have been all-day kindergarten since 1976 or so? [...] I went through kindergarten in 1975, and they put it back in in either 1976 or 1977 (my wife attended all-day kindergarten).
|