RedSoxPDAer
Member

Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 78 |
Re: Good Night!
quote: Originally posted by bscblue
I take issue to everything you have said. I cannot believe someone could have so many problems and complaints about a product such as this. Did you RESEARCH the VP before you bought it? Did you consider what VoiceStream service must be like where you are?
Actually, if you read my review, you would see that I purchased the VP at $49.99 with a one year service plan. Therefore, the VP was on the market a while before I purchased because it was on the market for a while at an excessive $299. I did, in-fact, research the Visorphone extensivley, contrary to your assumption. I read reviews on it that noted its bulkiness and some quirks but overall I felt that it was worth the risk for only $49 and a year of service at $19.99/month from Voicestream. I am here to tell you that I don't feel its worth even that low risk.
quote: Because after what you've said, I assume VoiceStream must operate a bit differently in different regions, i.e. I don't get an SMS message saying I have voicemail; my phone simply alerts me once I turn it on.
Voicestream in New England sends you an SMS message informing you of a new message received.
quote: I sell cell phones and have been privy to selling some of the smallest and also some of the biggest phones. The VP is a bit big but as you yourself have said Nextel's phones are just as big and I know some people who li8ke substantial phones anyway. Older people especially like big phones and everyoe else just has preferences. I myself don't care. I'm not in this for a fashion show; I want to be able to check my email, talk to my friends, and go on about my business. You sound more like you want to be popular and seem trendy. All my friends think the VP is cool and love my phones versatility.
I agree that size in a cell phone is all a preference of the user. However, most users here have commented that the VP is a very large and heavy combo for a cell phone. My opinion is that a smaller cell phone is more practical for everyday and all-function use.
quote: Nextel, as person in the heavily into wireless industry, makes a fine two-radio. Brilliant even with their DirectConnect. BUt that's it. They make, excuse my language, sh*tty cell phones; and EVERYONE knows it. And you can't be very inconspicuous or have a private conversation with a friggin' two-way radio; anyyone can hear you. But all in all, they are great for outdoors type businesses and rednecks (I'm from Alabama; we got alot of those around).p
I disagree. As someone who claims to be in the wireless industry, you have seem to have no clue about industry trends, reputation, and the most advanced equipment. All of Nextel's phones are made by Motorola, whichs owns stake in the company. Nextel does NOT include a two-way FRS (2 mile range) in all of its models. However, all of it's models have Direct-Connect, which uses cell sites just like a regular phone call does but at a lower quality sound. This free's up bandwidth and allows you to get right through to the other Nextel customer. The Direct-Connect feature can be put on speaker or be used like a regular cell phone call would be by putting the phone to your ear for privacy.
Nextel is GSM/TDMA, with plans to move to WCDMA, a 3G technology. GSM (i.e. Voicestream) is a fancy global version of TDMA, which was established in the 1980s and is widley being phased out in the U.S. (AT&T Wireless and Cingular have moved from TDMA to GSM) in favor of CDMA (i.e. SprintPCS and Verizon Wireless). Plus, Nextel supports iDEN, which allows for phone software java updates over the network and for download of java apps such as SEGA games to the phone.
Nextel's over-air modem speeds are also (and always have been) 19kbps, which is TWICE as fast as Voicestream currently (i.e. You can surf the web with your notebook or Visor twice as fast when connected through a Nextel phone). WCDMA (3G version of CDMA) will allow surfing speeds of 384kbps, which is like DSL. Did I mention that Nextel charges you to the second, whereas Voicestream rounds up to the next minute? These seconds can add to a ton of extra minutes.
I actually mentioned no complaints regarding Voicestream's GSM service. I have had exceptional call quality and coverage with the VisorPhone, except in semi-rural areas. Your the one who brought the issue up and I just explained some of the shortcomings of Voicestream's network because obviously you weren't aware or them as "a person heavily in the wireless industry".
quote: And as for dangerous night driving and trying to control the phone, that doesn't make much sense. After six months you should alread know where all the buttons are on the screen without lighting it up. I have had my VP for less time than you and I know EXACTLY where all the buttons are located, without backlighting.
Kinda eliminates the use of Caller ID when the lighting is bad and driving doesn't it? Your argument makes no sense! Who cares if I know where the buttons are already. I want to see who is calling me and I want to answer the call as efficiently as possible, and the VP fails at this important task. Everyone would agree with that. Its a practicality issue, which I hear the Treo will fix (see below for my theory on this).
quote: And as for battery life, I get fine battery life and I use my phone alot more than you. I have the 29.99 plan so that speaks volumes right there, no pun intended. LOL My battery life has seemed to have changed dramatically. Actually, I think I used batteries the same amount.
Most people have commented on the horrendous PDA battery life with the VP inserted. Actually, when I take my VP out of my Visor, my Visor "battery life bar" actually refills 10%. The VP lithium-ion battery is fine as far as I'm concerned. I made no mention of that. It just makes my Visor eat up expensive AAA Duracells like crazy. Again, read before you attack.
quote: What did you expect when you bought the phone? You sound less like a disgruntled consumer and more like uninformed consumer who didn't properly evaluate his purchase before making it.
Its called an opinion buddy. I have had the VP for over 6 months now, so I think I am entitled to my opinion about the product. IN MY OPINION, HS used the VP as a beta version of the Treo's interface. It charged $299 for that beta initially and then $249 then $199 then $99 then $49 then FREE as the Treo approached release. It ironed out the interface problems and practicality issues for the Treo, added in features for the Treo based on VP customer input, and now it will tell all of its loyal VP/Treo "beta testers" that they should run out and pay $399 for the product they helped to refine with their feedback: The almighty Treo. Bless those who paid over $100 for the VP, because they were robbed.
So don't preach to me about cell phone technology and blast me for my opinion. If you like the VP, then write your own opinion touting its great benefit in YOUR life. But maybe, just maybe, there's another 25-year-old out there like me who is considering purchasing the VP and is looking on some comment from a peer about the product. I've provided my opinion from my point-of-view. That's what this forum is here for. If you disagree with my opinion, I am o.k.with that. But don't attack my decision-making and basically call me a disgruntled and ignorant consumer who didn't research a cell phone purchase. That... my friend... couldn't be further from the truth.
Last edited by RedSoxPDAer on 01-10-2002 at 10:58 PM
|