Gameboy70
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: Metro Station, Hollywood and Highland
Posts: 1018 |
Re: To EricG
quote: Originally posted by vtaia
I guess "I don't waste my money on products that I don't have 100% control over the content.. " is just a nicer way of saying that you want to be able to break copyright laws with no one stopping you.
Just think...if you put in lots of time developing your talents, working on some intellectual capital, produced content (a book, music, software etc) and planned on making a living selling it on the net. But unfortunately everyone likes to have complete 100% control over the stuff you produce. In that case, you would definitely need to keep your day job.
Just a thought
Any policy that starts with the presumption of guilt is anti-consumer. As a humanist, I would add that it's antisocial. There are spiritual implications, which unfortunately never get discussed in IP debates, for a society founded on mistrust.
But if content providers want to restrict control of what they call intellectual property, that's fine -- as long as it doesn't interfere with the use of my physical property: i.e. the media I paid for. If violating my property rights is the way content providers avoid getting a day job, it just means they have one less customer. I can stomach proprietary software for the most part, since most handheld software is proprietary. But I draw the line a so-called "digital rights management" aimed at recordable media.
Just another thought.
|