Registered: Feb 2000
Location:
Posts: 638

Hey, you didn't say "Thank-you" this time. I feel offended.
BEN
Oh ya, were you trying to make a joke there?

[Edited by BEN on 09-05-2000 at 11:07 PM]

Registered: May 2000
Location: Mesa, AZ USA
Posts: 213

Re: Re: Re: I've had about enough

You sound so intelligent. But you can't even understand that a patent abstract. Is just
a small view of an entire FOREST. Why don't you review the claims. The claims are
fact not fiction. The only part of the entire document that can be challenged is the
claims. So forget the ABSTRACT.

Did I push your button YET.
Inventor

__________________

http://www.vsps.com/

Registered: Apr 2000
Location: St Petersburg Fla
Posts: 224

I read the claims. They refer to an electronic instrument. PDA's are not electronic instruments, they are computers. Electronic instruments may have some of the characteristics of computers, but not all. Computers can mimic the characteristics of electronic instruments with the appropriate hardware and software applications, but they are still computers, not electronic instruments.
Therefore your patent does not apply to PDA's.

Registered: Feb 2000
Location:
Posts: 638

OK, lets not get into this debate again. Bud, I don't know if you were around for the last debate, but it ended up being over 200 posts about that exact topic.
BEN
Once again Bill, you forgot to put the much anticipated thank-you. Maybe your realising that we don't like you.

Registered: Jan 2000
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 1683

Bud:

Save your breath--er--your fingers...you can't debate Warman. Many have tried (myself included) but it is very much like debating your younger brother when you were 10. Or like debating the Knights who say Nik in Monty Python (how's that for an analogy!) Or like debating the merits of birth control with a 75 year old Roman Catholic. Common sense just isn't there.

Granted, I'm probably not using too much common sense by potentially offending 75 year old Roman Catholics, but, on the other hand, it's not like I'm offending my potential customers or anything...

__________________
We're all naked if you turn us inside out.
-David Byrne

Registered: May 2000
Location: Mesa, AZ USA
Posts: 213

quote:

---

Originally posted by BEN
OK, lets not get into this debate again. Bud, I don't know if you were around for the last debate, but it ended up being over 200 posts about that exact topic.
BEN
Once again Bill, you forgot to put the much anticipated thank-you. Maybe your realising that we don't like you.

---

__________________

http://www.vsps.com/

Registered: May 2000
Location: Mesa, AZ USA
Posts: 213

quote:

---

Originally posted by homer
Bud:

Save your breath--er--your fingers...you can't debate Warman. Many have tried (myself included) but it is very much like debating your younger brother when you were 10. Or like debating the Knights who say Nik in Monty Python (how's that for an analogy!) Or like debating the merits of birth control with a 75 year old Roman Catholic. Common sense just isn't there.

Granted, I'm probably not using too much common sense by potentially offending 75 year old Roman Catholics, but, on the other hand, it's not like I'm offending my potential customers or anything...

---

__________________

http://www.vsps.com/

Registered: Jun 2000
Location: South Lake, FL
Posts: 103

quote:

---

Originally posted by BEN
OK, lets not get into this debate again...

---

__________________
Eschew obfuscation!

Registered: Apr 2000
Location: St Petersburg Fla
Posts: 224

I was hoping that he would explain in more detail the reasons for a patent infringement concerning PDA screen protectors. However, that has not happened. Therefore I can conclude that none exists and will not waste my time with further posts.

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Texan in Calgary for a while
Posts: 1361

I'm closing this thread because it has once again degenerated into a flame war.

Any new topic postings relating to Warman and his patent will be closed.

__________________
James Hromadka
Old Friend