foo fighter
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: I'm not sure, but I see lots of lights everywhere.
Posts: 1287 |
Oh come on everyone! Let's stop this entire Palm vs. Pocket PC argument once and for all.
In the end it all comes down to the needs of the end user. For someone who wants more functionality, and multimedia (MP3) compatibilities, currently, the Palm is simply not an option. I still love my Visor, but the last time I checked, I couldn't play MP3 files, it didn't have a built-in web browser with wireless capabilities, and it certainly didn't have a high resolution color display, and it still has a cheap plastic case.
Obviously not everyone wants all of the features of a Pocket PC, and that's perfectly fine. My only point is that you can't add to the capabilities of the Palm, the Visor yes, but the Palm...no. And let's face it, as of now, the Visor has only gained a very small percentage of the PDA pie. Right now the best selling PDA is the Palm V series.
And for those who still think I'm wrong for wanting my PDA to play MP3 tracks, you had better look at the latest news item posted at CNET News.com, apparently Palm executives have, finally, admitted that features such as wireless internet access, color displays, voice recognition, and MP3 playback are going to converge, even on their handhelds. And if you think Pocket PC devices are absurd for having 200 MHZ ARM processors, then you had better hold on to your checkbooks because, apparently, Palm is moving to a 200-400MHZ processor as well.
Lets see, didn't all of you tell me that Palm would never add these features because..."we don't need multimedia capabilities". Apparently Microsoft isn't as crazy as everyone thinks. Enjoy your handheld!
---------------------
Foo
|