Gameboy70
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: Metro Station, Hollywood and Highland
Posts: 1018 |
elfbomber:
Thanks for the link. But D ev R ay 4Real is probably right: there's no visible substance behind the LA Times claim, especially since they don't quote anyone from Handspring, or anyone else. Of course, this is definitely a case where it's better to be wrong.
yucca:
I don't think Handspring's future developments have anything to do with the slow release of the modules. The best explanation I've heard was from Innogear: in the last year there's been a worldwide shortage of many components used for handheld devices, particularly cell phones, which have been in in record demand. Innogear and other springboard manufacturers have had to get in a queue behind other consumer electronics manfacturers that already had outstanding orders.
I doubt that Handspring let many companies in on the springboard's technical details earlier enough before the Visor's release to get a head start. Add time for marketing, market research (how many units should we make?), design, testing, redesign, purchasing (e.g. the component shortage issue), negotiating and coordinating distribution, etc. -- and you get big delays.
Moreover, this is the first generation of springboard products, so the learning curve is probably steeper than products with a history like pagers and cell phones. Springboard manufacturers are starting from zero experience, which is why they underestimated the time to market. The standard learning curve in manufacturing is that production runs are 20% faster each year. In other words, it takes real experience to learn how to cut corners, and make things more efficient. I suspect that a year from now, these companies will go from announcement to product in three or four months.
|