Gameboy70
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: Metro Station, Hollywood and Highland
Posts: 1018 |
For once, the whining's justified. It's admirable the the vast majority of 4000 Springboard developers allegedly out there are doing what Thincomm did: say nothing until they have a product to ship.
Not that it matters in the long run. The MiniJam and the SixPak are still the most coveted of the announced modules, and I'm sure that they'll do very well if they ship.
But my guess is that if there are indeed thousands of Springboard developers out there, at least a few of them are working on competing products that are as good or even better than those two modules. That's arguably empty speculation, but so is guessing when the two announced modules are going to ship. The MiniJam, for instance, debuted at Internet World last October, and was slated for release at the end of that year. Two months shy of a full year later, Innogear has deigned to take pre-orders, whatever that means.Also debuted last October was the SixPack, which is now due out in October of this year.
Innogear may doing everything they can to meet the demand, but from a public relations standpoint they've created the customer perception that they've abdicated all responsibility for the delays. For them to tell customers to redirect their complaints elsewhere simply adds insult to injury, as if customers were the ones who announced the product prematurely in the first place.
I'm over Innogear. One thing the long delays have done is give me time to reflect on what modules I really need, not want. I realized that what I really need is uncompromised access to the internet anytime, anywhere. So I'm holding out for the Minstrel S. Then the SixPak's modems will be irrelevant.
Prediction: if the SixPak is ever released, it'll sell for $259, minimum -- not "under $200." A don't complain. Be sure to blame those evil parts suppliers.
[This message has been edited by Gameboy70 (edited 07-22-2000).]
|