mgizzi
Member
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Grand Junction, Colorado
Posts: 9 |
Re: Re: Pi Direct---- ughhh....
quote: Originally posted by dvIceT
I realize you're venting, but what would happen if PI Tech had generated a code based on Palm user name? People would complain that they could use PiDirect on only one of their Visors. At least this way, you could store the reg code on the MemPlug, then transfer it over to whatever Visor your MemPlug happens to be plugged into, regardless of what the Palm user name is.
I agree that the Hagiwara is probably better for everyday use, but its usability comes at a price of ~$9 per MB while CF or SM cards can come in at <$1 per MB. Also, with a separate card reader, you still have access to docs and files on the external memory card w/o having to work through the Visor to access them.
As for your last point, I think it's pretty ironic that one of the PalmOS's biggest strengths, its ability to run programs from the same RAM that it's stored in, now presents problems when users want to run programs from external memory cards. Maybe we should get used to PocketPC/WinCE-type thinking, where users have to decide how much of their handheld RAM to dedicate to running programs and how much to dedicate to storage. Inevitably, it will come to that.
Yup, I was partially venting. But regarding the regcode, I think that:
1) It is incumbent upon them that they make the need to do this clear on their description on the Palm Gear site. Had I known, I could have saved several day's worth of frustration. As it was, they took FOUR days before even alerting me to the missing regcode issue.
2) There are ways around the user name issue for multiple palms. See the program tweak user.
Regarding the cost of the memory, you are right, CF and SM are cheaper, but we need to balance out the cost per MB versus the performance hit on the visor. To me, the CF is great to be able to store a lot of stuff, but for everyday use pretty much everything I need (including several large ebooks) fit comfortably on the 165MB flash module, with no performance hit at all. Had there been no performance issues, I would be using the memplug all the time.
I hope we will not need to get used to the Pocket PC style of thought, with splitting ram and storage. Given that Palm itself is now making devices with external memory storage, there should be pressure on them to find the solution to this issue - at least by version 5.0 of the OS. Ok, I know this is wishful thinking!
Cheers,
Mike
|