Eug
Member
Registered: Nov 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 434 |
You are correct. I made the possibly incorrect assumption he didn't have one of those. Anyway, a receiver with built-in AC-3 usually has better adjustability than a setup as you have described, and quite often is as cheap in the end.
DTS? I dunno. My DVD player is almost two years old, and my receiver is around 1.5 years old. Ie. I don't have DTS, and I actually don't care either. Most of the movies that tend to be DTS are big action flicks. While they're nice to watch, I don't tend to purchase them. I tend to purchase movies which often have only stereo tracks. (What I hate though is stereo encoded as AC-3 tracks in stereo, esp for music. Quality does suffer often.)
And, for recent movies, AC-3 can be as good as DTS. (One of the "problems" with AC-3 is that anybody with the proper equipment can code it so the quality really varies. DTS is pretty much consistently good though, although some of the stuff (like some AC-3) seems overly loud in the surrounds.
|