MPM
Member
Registered: Jun 2000
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 216 |
Prism should not have bad pixels
quote: Originally posted by Tan Kit Hoong
Bad pixels exist in every colour LCD display out there - even on laptop computers.
Usually, companies like Toshiba and Compaq will have a minimum number of bad pixels before they will give you a replacement - usually in the range of 20 or so pixels, I think.
Therefore, having just one bad pixel on the Prism screen is okay, I think. I would be bothered if there were two or three.
Not "every colour LCD" has bad pixels. Bad pixels are much more common on the larger displays, such as on laptops. This is simply because the screens are so much bigger.
The small 160x160 screen of the Visor Prism is so small that none of them should have bad pixels. The yield on the small screens should be so high that throwing out the ones with bad pixels should not affect the price of the good ones that much.
Think of it this way: The Visor Prism has 160x160x3 = 76,800 total pixels. A 800x600 laptop panel has 800x600*3 = 1,440,000 total pixels. So the laptop panel has just under 19 times the number of pixels as the Visor Prism. So if 5 to 10 bad pixels on some laptop screens are "normal" then the Visor Prism should have only .25 to 5 bad pixels on some panels. i.e. no panels should have bad pixels.
Ok, the real world is not so perfect, but like I said the yield penalty on the Visor Prism size panel should be very low.
|