news | articles | reviews | software | modules | accessories | discussion | faq | mobile | store
VisorCentral.com >> Discussion >> Visor Related >> Springboard Modules
Why a 33.6 Modem?

Post a New Thread | Post A Reply

  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Topic: Why a 33.6 Modem?    
handsprung
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location:
Posts: 179

Question

Handspring has a 33.6 modem for the Visor and Palm has a 33.6k modem for the Palm V and a 14.4 modem for the Palm III. Can these devices not handle a 56k modem? Why make these slower modems? If the Visor can sync with a fast USB connection why not make a 56k modem for remote connections???

Doesn't make any sense? Unless they are just trying to keep costs to a minimum???

handsprung is offline Old Post 09-17-1999 01:51 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for handsprung Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
bpowell423
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Dayton, TN, USA
Posts: 66

Post

JMHO, but the modem in the Visor (and Palm) is primarily for email and other low-traffic connections, right? Is there a need great enough to justify the jump to 56k? Now, if you had some sort of hand-held device actually capable of surfing the web (ie, hi-res, color screen, memory, speed, etc.), then I could see the benefit of a high-speed connection. I think we're still a long way away from having devices with these capabilities that still maintain the size, weight and battery life of the Palms. Any thoughts?

bpowell423 is offline Old Post 09-17-1999 03:56 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for bpowell423 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
handsprung
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location:
Posts: 179

Smile

True, and I see your point. But mine is that the faster you can go, the better. Thats one of the reasons they switched to USB, for super fast syncing. Well, one of the main uses of the modem is remote syncing. So, why not a 56k modem that would almost double the speed for that particular process. And for those who use software to directly check email over a dialup it would be faster...

handsprung is offline Old Post 09-17-1999 06:34 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for handsprung Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
10basetom
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 17

Post

Maybe it's the fact that 56k modems simply consume more power?

10bt

10basetom is offline Old Post 09-18-1999 06:41 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for 10basetom Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
visors
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location:
Posts: 5

Arrow

The answer's quite simple, really: 33.6k is yesterday's technology. Therefore you pay a lower price.

visors is offline Old Post 09-18-1999 07:03 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for visors Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
emeyer
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsford,NY,USA
Posts: 223

Lightbulb

Since the modem will primarily be used to connect to another computer not a ISP, 33.6 is actually the fastest speed possible. 56K requires a digital switch at the ISP end. (Your 56K modem can't dial another 56K modem and connect at 56K! 33.6 is the max unless a digital switch is used.)

emeyer is offline Old Post 09-18-1999 11:19 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for emeyer Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
handsprung
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location:
Posts: 179

Talking

Ah, someone with a little more knowledge of the situation steps in and explains the problem. That makes sense now.

handsprung is offline Old Post 09-18-1999 01:35 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for handsprung Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:41 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
[ Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread ]

Forum Jump:

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.4
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.