Kiporama
Member
Registered: Jun 2000
Location: Orem, UT USA
Posts: 6 |
Concerns about Innogear from another posting of mine echoed here...
As for the Innogear board, I have to say I remain skeptical. Their product has been
announced for several months, and yet they are still not shipping. I have to wonder
about the chipset they are using, and if they are having sourcing delays from whoever
they are sourcing their modem silicon from. That's a lot of features to put into a piece of silicon that is going to run on the Visor battery.
In contrast, Thincom uses Analog Devices silicon, and they are known for their expertise in low power consumption DSPs. Card Access claims it draws less than 50mA when fully active. Any device that wants to draw power from the Springboard slot has to consume no more than 100mA, from what I have read. I'd be interested in knowing what the
power curve on the Innogear product will be. A modem that draws only 50mA is pretty impressive.
Last of all, the flip-out jacks, such as the one to be used in the Innogear product, are
still going to require pulling the Visor out of a carrying case or organizer if you want to connect. In a perfect world, an XJACK Springboard would be the answer, but even XJACK might be too thick.
So, for the foreseeable future, I'll go with Thincom for analog connectivity, and take a look at the wireless solutions as they start to trickle on to the market. 33.6Kbps
transmission speeds are sufficient for mobile e-mail retrevial, remote hotsyncing, and casual browsing (and is a heck of a lot faster than the rates you get over a cell phone connection).
I'll take Thincom's shipping 33.6Kbps module over a "vapor" 56K module based on the flux capacitor, cold fusion, or some other such "breakthrough technologies" as well, thank you...
Kiporama (the self-appointed Thincom Apologist)
|