dvIceT
Member
Registered: Dec 2000
Location:
Posts: 152 |
quote: Originally posted by molly1216
yeah...but is that instant spur of the moment kind of snapshot
worth 200 bucks?
Sheesh, you don't have to put it like that! 
I had to plunk down the full $200 unlike that lucky smittyofdhs. The blow was softened a bit by being able to retroactively apply a 10% discount.
As for that "spur of the moment" thing, I've only recently committed to capturing images of the family, friends, and things around me. I was never and probably never will be the kind of person who would carry a "real" camera around in day-to-day life, but it kind of hit me last year when we had to put one of our dogs to sleep that we didn't have many pictures of him as he grew up. The Eye2 is part of my committment to pay more attention to my everyday life.
The picture quality is usually only so-so but as long as I can see the expressions on people's faces, it's more than good enough. For me, a real digital camera would spend more time as a paperweight at home or in the car because of its obtrusiveness, while the Eye2 is always at hand. Like I'm fond of saying:
What good is the great quality of the pictures you never take?
Because I have my Visor with me the vast majority of the time, my cost/benefit analysis goes something like this:
$200 for being able take lower quality pictures 95% of the time beats out $150-$200 for being able to take high qualitiy pictures (maybe) 5% of the time.
Your cost/benefit analysis may vary. 
|