ragamuffinn
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: Mililani, HI, USA
Posts: 256 |
quote: Originally posted by dampeoples
I absolutely love reading why you people do not want a Treo. Please, tell me more.
It isn't that we don't want a Treo as much as it is that we want Handspring to keep the Visor line current. We have springboard modules that are still very young and perfectly functional. You try spending several hundred dollars in springboards and then celebrate when it starts looking like your expansion format is being abandoned by the company. Then you can tell us more about why you want a Treo.
The buzz is that wireless is everything. This is true and completely false at the same time. As if to beg the question, the buzz is true because wireless is the buzz. However, wireless is still not affordable, nor are there trustworthy and widespread standards in place for adoption. Furthermore, non-wireless handhelds still have perfectly admirable uses, even though the industry eggheads say they don't. (Try asking my mom who just got a new Visor Deluxe for mother's day, or my sister who bought one the day after (after she heard how cheap they are...) Those "obsolete" handhelds are revolutionizing the way they keep their personal information. Yes, these are just anecdotes, but they demonstrate that there are people who are only now being introduced to good, basic PDAs who can't even fathom the need for wireless yet.)
The Treo 90, though non-wireless, is expandable. Yet, its expansion media is flawed. I would never buy into an expansion format that doesn't already promise I/O. The springboard does. Handspring says they may include I/O via firmware updates, but that's still vaporware....and vaporware has a tendency to dissipate so thinly that you can't even find a relevant press release.
Simply put, the springboard is a great expansion format and it has a sizeable user base. That is why we'd rather have a Visor.
Last edited by ragamuffinn on 05-29-2002 at 08:40 AM
|