BudPritchard
Member

Registered: Apr 2000
Location: St Petersburg Fla
Posts: 224 |
Forced to buy a new box.
quote: Originally posted by na2rboy
G3? 15" monitor? 64MB of RAM? 16th century GPU? I firmly believe that an "all-in-one" iMac with better components (G4, 17" monitor, 192 MB of RAM or more, nVidia GPU w/ 32 MB DDR RAM) would sell. The two firewire ports are really nice, but if you are editing video with 64 MB of RAM, an ATI 128 GPU, and a 15" monitor, you are in for a world of hurtin'.
This is the main problem I have had with the Mac platform when they came out in the 80's. If you needed a more powerful processor, you are forced to buy a complete new box. The Apple II hardware jockeys went to other platforms such as the Amiga.
With the PC platform, you plug in a new CPU chip, maybe bump memory up or go to faster memory, voila!; new system a lot cheaper than buying a whole new box.(Of course, in those days, it wasn't as easy as today to cobble together your own system. However, it was possible. I took my 8XXX to a 286 with a board in an available slot.)
In my case,my new system that I put together about a year ago, my budget forced me to select between 64meg and a PIII or 128meg and a Celeron. Now that the memory/cpu prices have dropped, I'll get a 600 PIII(which I can overclock thru BIOS) and additional 128meg(my mobo maxes out at 1GB) when I go to Windows 2000.
If I decide that I really want a P4, then, I can go with a new motherboard and compatable memory.
Or if I want to dump Intel, I can go to a mobo supporting AMD chips.
Or now, there are motherboards with built in RAID. With drives being so inexpensive, mirroring is a viable option.
Or I could dump Windows and go to Linux. If there is something I want that is not in the OS, I write it myself.
I have always felt that Apple missed a huge opportunity not porting the MAC OS to the Intel Platform. The MAC OS is a cleaner and more stable OS than Windows. But I can't build my own box and upgrade components and use the MAC OS.
|