Gameboy70
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: Metro Station, Hollywood and Highland
Posts: 1018 |
Glenayre's @ctiveLink pager, like all pagers, will require a service plan. If the pricing was anything like the InfoMitt's SkyTel plan ($39.95 for 3 months or 1000 units: 10 characters = 1 unit), then it's much more reasonable than $50 a month for a "real" wireless modem.
Unfortunately Glenayre doesn't have any pricing information on their website, even for their existing products. Wireless as become such a buzzword, as the AT&T Wireless IPO demonstrated, that Glenayre changed the product description from "two-way pager" to "wireless messaging module." My main reservation is that they might assume, like Palm or Omnisky, that consumers are willing to pay any amount for wirelessness.
Glenayre claims you can "send requests to Internet information services for sports, stock market, weather updates, and more." I'm hoping that this information will be accessed through PQAs, but my fear is that Glenayre is building some kind of proprietary information network. While this is not terrible per se, it does mean that they'll have to pass the cost of such an infrastructure on to the consumer, like the $40/mo. Palm.net service.
The InfoMitt, at least as originally advertised, is a one-way pager. Sensitive to the criticism, Innogear even put ONE-WAY in all caps on their website, then started calling it the "InfoMitt Receiver." The InfoMitt draws its power from the Visor also will not work outside of it, while the @ctiveLink, having its own batteries, will. When the @ctiveLink was announced a few months ago, Innogear was at a severe disadvantage. Not only was Glenayre's unit two-way, but the company even committed to a July release while Innogear only slated the InfoMitt for "summer" (note the Glenayre's site now says "summer" as well -- a bad harbinger?). The one thing the InfoMitt does have on the @ctiveLink is a really cool form factor (yeah, Rolando, the @ctiveLink's form factor sucks). I suspect Innogear offloaded the InfoMitt to Global Access knowing they were going to get hammered.
I also suspect that either Innogear or GA, or both, are working in stealth on a two-way model. We'll probably see a lot of modules at PC Expo 2K that have had no advanced announcement.
[This message has been edited by Gameboy70 (edited 06-03-2000).]
|