news | articles | reviews | software | modules | accessories | discussion | faq | mobile | store
VisorCentral.com >> Discussion >> Visor Related >> Springboard Modules
Soundoff: Wireless

Post a New Thread | Post A Reply

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Topic: Soundoff: Wireless    Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
JHromadka
VisorCentral Staff

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Texan in Calgary for a while
Posts: 1361

Exclamation

During PC Expo there were four modules shown that will have wireless capability. Palm also announced a kit that allows older models to use a cell phone to get online.

How important is this to you? Do you see wireless as something you need now, or (like Hawkins) would you rather vendors focus on other features? Are you going to shell out the $$$ for these modules?

------------------
James Hromadka
VisorCentral.com
Personal Website: http://www.Hromadka.com

JHromadka is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 06:31 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for JHromadka Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Petro
Member

Registered: Jan 2000
Location:
Posts: 241

Post

I don't see myself needing one now, but in a few years I will. For buisnesses and people who don't want to carry around a PDA and a cell phone, or a wireless modem for a laptop to access corporate info: the more the better!

Petro is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 06:36 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for Petro Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote

Guest

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

Post

Same here. There are obvious reasons for wanting to go wireless with your Visor, but I just don't have the need right now. Perhaps, as wireless service offerings develop further, I will one day have that need. At least I'll know that the hardware is available...

Old Post 06-30-2000 06:48 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Hoser_back_home
VisorCentral Staff

Registered: Nov 1999
Location: bright side of the moon.
Posts: 996

Post

Do i NEED it? Not entirely. Do I WANT it? Heck ya!

My goal is to not require my PC for my PIM. I like the idea of AnyDay.com and a wireless Palm (many don't like the idea of information being 'out there' instead of the PC but i think this is a fear that will slowly disappear in the future...like the fear of 'cookies' did).

I'd like to use my PC for computing and my palm for Information on the go. SO an optimal PIM would not be 'leashed' to my PC.

As far as cost is concerned...wow! Things look expensive now. But like ISP's, i'm sure they'll eventually come down. I won't be getting any wireless module until pricing comes down.

Hoser_back_home is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 06:52 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for Hoser_back_home Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
VTL
Member

Registered: Apr 2000
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 604

Thumbs up

I'm dying for a module that will enable a Visor to have some of the functionality of a RIM Blackberry. I depend heavilly on email to communicate with clients, and right now if I'm out of town I have to lug a laptop with me.

It would be great to have something that lets me get my work messages without wires or other entanglements.

VTL is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 06:55 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for VTL Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
foo fighter
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: I'm not sure, but I see lots of lights everywhere.
Posts: 1287

Thumbs down

At the moment, Wireless is VERY over hyped! First of all, the infrastructure isn't here yet. Secondly, neither is content. Until the day comes when we can stream video or audio over a fat wireless pipe, this is going to remain a rather limited media. Third, cost! Wireless access still remains considerably high. The going rate is around $40 monthly....too high!

I think Hawkins should collaborate with Palm in making much needed improvements to the OS. For example, pixel resolution and depth. I think Hawkins is becoming out of step with the times. He made a rather foolish statement at PC Expo that makes me wonder if he really knows what's best for this platform. When an audience member asked him when we will see a higher resolution display and a removal of the Graffiti area, he said..."we don't need higher resolutions. 160x160 is perfectly fine". Fine? What has me been smoking? Even Microsoft figured out that a higher resolution display with a soft input area yields a much clearer display with more readability. Even the new ebookman, from Franklin, has a clever screen layout with a 220 resolution.

Believe it or not, the one thing that surprised me with PC Expo is that Palm (and possibly Sony) is turning out to have a much broader vision than Hawkins! Jeff seems more concerned with keeping prices low than adding new features. Did anyone else here notice that Jeff gave a "no" answer to people in the audience who asked about a feature they would like to see added or changed to the PalmOS? I think he's perfectly happy with the OS as is, which leaves me questioning his judgment. His constant ramblings of "Simplicity" are making him look like Bill Gates preaching "Innovation through great software", it's becoming a tired argument. I think he's losing his touch. Bicycles are simple too, but I stopped using them for transportation when I was 16.

If this really is Handspring's philosophy, then they are going to be crushed by Palm, Sony, and Microsoft! I hope Hawkins realizes this before it's too late!

------------------
www.palmfactory.com

"No matter where you go...there you are!"

foo fighter is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 06:59 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for foo fighter Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
LarryN
Member

Registered: Jun 2000
Location: Pembroke,MA
Posts: 307

Thumbs down

They surely are up there on the cool factor, but unless the price gets lowered by signing up for access, there's no way that I'm going to shell out $369 plus $40/mo to have wireless access (can anybody say Palm VII). This puts cost of the Visor/access springboard combo into the stratsphere...

I was looking forward to these modules, but I'll have to pass for now until they are more reasonable.

-Larry

[This message has been edited by LarryN (edited 07-03-2000).]

LarryN is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 07:14 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for LarryN Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
AussiS5
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Somerset, MA USA
Posts: 23

Post

I agree with many statements made in the last post. I would however like to defend Hawkins' way of doing things. He wants to sell a lot of these things, right? So he has to keep the price as low as possible. Right now the technology in the Visor is in line with the price people are willing to pay for such a device. WinCE was terrible. The devices were too expensive for what people wanted to do with them. Do we need video on a Palm device right now? I would love to see a high res. screen but how much do i want to pay for one. He got it right with "simplicity". In the future simplicity will mean something different but for the time being we should be happy with all the things a visor (and Palm) do well.

AussiS5 is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 07:23 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for AussiS5 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
AussiS5
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Somerset, MA USA
Posts: 23

Post

sorry for a couple of things. I got off topic. Plus i said last post but someone posted while i was writing. Flame me if you must -- Jeff

AussiS5 is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 07:25 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for AussiS5 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
foo fighter
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: I'm not sure, but I see lots of lights everywhere.
Posts: 1287

Post

quote:
Originally posted by AussiS5:
I would love to see a high res. screen but how much do i want to pay for one.


That is a common misconception. Higher resolutions do not increase cost! For example look at the new Franklin ebookman:
www.franklin.com

It has a much higher resolution display (200x240), uses Microsoft ClearType technology, plays MP3 music, and yet sells for only $129.


------------------
www.palmfactory.com

"No matter where you go...there you are!"


[This message has been edited by foo fighter (edited 06-30-2000).]

foo fighter is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 07:30 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for foo fighter Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
perze_a
Member

Registered: Mar 2000
Location: nowheresburg, PH
Posts: 98

Thumbs down

As tempting as it may sound to be hip when you are without wires. Aside from the price, I can't seem to find any beneficial use with a wireless module. I'm gonna have to pass on this one. In a year or two maybe...... maybe.

I'd put it under consideration when the Colored visor appears in the market.

perze_a is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 08:04 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for perze_a Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Vinny
Member

Registered: Mar 2000
Location: NC, Indiana
Posts: 465

Post

Here's what I'm interested in. What about wireless networks on college campuses? Nearly all have ethernet connections in residence halls, etc etc now. I'm not sure how advanced some schools have already progressed but wouldn't it be more feasible at a college? Just like the network (with access to the Internet through it) where you pay a flat fee for the academic year--you could get a flat fee for wireless. Possibly the two would just be combined under a flat "University of ******* Network Access Fee". It could be much cheaper because of the large concentration of people as well. What do you guys think of wireless's potential at colleges and universities?

------------------
-Vinny

I'll pack my bags I swear I'll run, wish my friends were 21

Vinny is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 08:26 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for Vinny Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
BudPritchard
Member

Registered: Apr 2000
Location: St Petersburg Fla
Posts: 224

Exclamation

quote:
Originally posted by foo fighter:
That is a common misconception. Higher resolutions do not increase cost! For example look at the new Franklin ebookman:
www.franklin.com

It has a much higher resolution display (200x240), uses Microsoft ClearType technology, plays MP3 music, and yet sells for only $129.




PRICING!!!! This may start the direction of "Palm/Visor/PocketPC Killer" devices.
Handhelds are not the appropriate display platform for book reading. For me, I want a screen the size of a Pocket Book.
Also, Internet appliances are also on the horizon that are within the price range of wireless palms and PocketPCS.

I see for the Visor via the Springboard slot, a replacement for my cell phone.
Why pay the $$$ for a PocketPC when for close to the same amount of money you can buy a WebPC (Dell).

BudPritchard is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 09:25 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for BudPritchard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
foo fighter
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: I'm not sure, but I see lots of lights everywhere.
Posts: 1287

Thumbs up

quote:
Originally posted by BudPritchard:
Handhelds are not the appropriate display platform for book reading.


No offense, but I disagree entirely! On the contrary, small handhelds are the IDEAL platform for portable electronic books. There certainly seems to be a lot of interest in books for Palms, Visors, and Pocket PCs. If you don't believe me check out Memoware.com, or even the Gutenberg Project.

But, you are right that PDAs are not perfect for reading books. But if you add a color screen and "near print quality" text, it is quite readable. The only handheld I've ever used that I think fails miserably as a book reader is the Palm V. The display is just too small. The Visor, Palm III series, and even the Pocket PC seem to have the right form factor, at least in terms of screen size.


[This message has been edited by foo fighter (edited 06-30-2000).]

foo fighter is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 09:43 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for foo fighter Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
bwoods
Member

Registered: May 2000
Location: Highland
Posts: 4

Thumbs up

On Topic:

Yes, I would be interested in wireless tech for the Palm to save me email time. I will wait, however, until prices do drop. I will also pass on web browsing until data speeds increase.

Off Topic (from previous posts):

I think that the Palm platform is a great way to read books. Can it be better? Of course. But it works well now. I've been reading books on the train, subway, bus, standing in lines, etc. now for almost two years. For text only (no graphs, photos, etc.) it is simply the best way to carry around books! I don't have to lug bulk or pounds around and I can read whereever and whenever I want.

I could live w/o higher res and larger screens, but of course, I always want bigger, faster, better. The Franklin has TONS of screen area it seems. Wow.

bwoods is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 09:58 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for bwoods Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Gameboy70
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: Metro Station, Hollywood and Highland
Posts: 1018

Post

The need for wireless access depends on your lifestyle. I hate being tethered to a wall. I want wireless and I want it now. I don't need streaming, Flash or other extravagant multimedia. Streaming isn't intended for mobile usage. I just want to be able to have access to information anytime, anywhere -- without being forced to enter data through a numeric keypad. If I want to know what time a movie's playing, it would be nice not to have to hunt through a newspaper to get the information. Also, as a journalist I really need to be able to research and submit stories from remote locations. I especially want the ability to send and receive email from anywhere.

I originally bought the Apple Newton because it was eventually supposed to offer wireless messaging (hence the name Newton MessagePad). Five years later we're only starting to realize the PDA as a messaging platform. When wireless access drops below $20 a month, I think it will change the way people look at the internet.

[This message has been edited by Gameboy70 (edited 06-30-2000).]

Gameboy70 is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 10:02 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for Gameboy70 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
miradu
TreoCentral Staff

Registered: May 2000
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1429

Arrow

I don't need wireless access the way that I use my visor. It is also way to expensive for a 13 year old! I already have to pay for the pager I'm getting for the visor.

The wireless access that I want is a 802.11b module. (wireless ethernet) (there's one in dev). That way when I'm in my bed or in the basement I can surf the web, and etc.

========================================
Visor + Linux = Perfection
MD

miradu is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 10:36 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for miradu Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Hoser_back_home
VisorCentral Staff

Registered: Nov 1999
Location: bright side of the moon.
Posts: 996

Post

http://www.allnetdevices.com/wirele...rizon_adds.html

Everybody keeps touting this $40/month charge ....

Verizon (Bell Atlantic Mobile) just announced wireless web access for handhelds at $24.95/month for unlimited usage!

Let the price wars BEGIN!

Hoser_back_home is offline Old Post 06-30-2000 11:12 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for Hoser_back_home Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
rmapes
Member

Registered: Apr 2000
Location:
Posts: 73

Post

I find this whole wireless thing pretty amusing. All these vendors hawking expensive springboard solutions. Even more amusing are the cellphone manufacturers who think that surfing the net and reading e-mail on their puny cellphone screens will be a rewarding experience. I have been using Sprint PCS to download my e-mail and even surf the net using my Visor. And it cost $9.95 per month. And you don't need a springboard, just a serial cable.

rmapes is offline Old Post 07-01-2000 12:56 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for rmapes Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Gameboy70
Member

Registered: Oct 1999
Location: Metro Station, Hollywood and Highland
Posts: 1018

Thumbs up

quote:
Originally posted by Hoser_in_USA:

Verizon (Bell Atlantic Mobile) just announced wireless web access for handhelds at $24.95/month for unlimited usage!

Let the price wars BEGIN!


Here, here!

The initially exhorbitant prices are intended for business executives, journalists and sales reps -- not the average consumer. That's why the can get away with charging $40/mo. or more. Wireless networks with nationwide coverage are uber-expensive to build and get permits for, so the companies charge a lot of money at first; then when they've made their money back, they can ease up on the pricing. Hence we have providers like Verizon and AT&T Wireless starting to break the $25/mo. barrier. It was the same way with pagers in the seventies and cell phones in the eighties, we most of us thought they were ridiculous status symbols. Five or ten years from now even high school students will have wireless internet access, even if its from a Gameboy.

Unlike a lot of people on VisorCentral, I don't have the temperment to spend a lot of time gathering data on the PC to put in the Visor. I HotSynch maybe once or twice a month. I'd consider it much more convenient to get information on the Visor from the internet on demand, rather than downloading to the PC then transfering it.

[This message has been edited by Gameboy70 (edited 06-30-2000).]

Gameboy70 is offline Old Post 07-01-2000 02:05 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for Gameboy70 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:23 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
 Pages (3): [1] 2 3 » Last Thread   Next Thread
[ Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread ]

Forum Jump:

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.4
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.