Hawkeye
Member

Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Posts: 146 |
Okay, I'm not taking sides with G-man or James. However, I will give my input on this subject.
The main reason that I haven't switched from my IIIx to a Visor is twofold, but only the first part is applicable (BTW, the second part of my reason is waiting for color screens on the Palm IIIc, so you can see it doesn't apply)
Anyway, I haven't bought a Visor yet because I fear that Handspring is going through the growing pains of a new company. The main problems, support and shipping, have been extensively documented in this forum and others. However, marketing and support aren't the only problems.
I do feel that there are a few problems that Handspring could have resolved if they would have waited a little longer to release the product. Further testing and internal use of the Visor would have shown that the screen and the cases are both too soft or weak. We all know that in designing this product, the designers probably had a III series Palm sitting right there with them, and if they had actually tried the Visor out, they would have seen the exact same problem as everyone else with the Visor.
In my opinion (only my opinion, this is not a researched statement and I'm trying to pass this off as fact) HandSpring released the Visor when they did because of fear that the new Palm IIIc would be reasonably priced and have some new features to make the Visor look less appealing. IMO, the Visor was released when it was so that HS would have 4 months of non-color Palm OS devices in the competition. I'm not saying this is the sole reason, nor am I saying that Handspring definetely released the product earlier than they hoped; all I'm saying is that it's a distinct possibility.
Don't get me wrong, I'm still intrigued by the Visor and I wish that Palm would learn from Handspring on things like pricing, memory and the idea of a springboard. However, like I said, the Visor hasn't earned the right to replace my IIIx.
|