Registered: Sep 2000
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 501

Given all the discussion about Palm OS upgradability on Visors, I was wondering if (and when) Handspring might decide to stop using the Palm OS. I don't desire this -- as a developer, who wants to have two platforms to write for? And all the people writing for a single OS means a larger selection of software.

But given the talent that the Palm founders brought over to Handspring with them, I'd be surprised if Handspring's SW team wouldn't like to take the drivers seat, design-wise, and be able to steer the Visor in directions other than those dictated by the Palm OS team.

If so, the question is when: at what version of the Palm OS would Handspring abandon it? A few initial thoughts:

4.0?: A lot of posters on this board have complained that Palm OS 4.0 adds very little to Palm OS 3.5 -- at least from the user's view. However, it appears OS 4.0 has built-in support for BlueTooth wireless communication -- and BlueTooth-enabled Springboard modules could be extremely useful.

5.0?: As I understand it, Palm OS 5.0 is not going to run on current or older Palms or Visors -- it is aimed at PDAs using the ARM processor, instead of Motorola Dragonball processors. Current Palm software (i.e., written for Palm OS 4.0 and earlier) will run on Palm OS 5.0 using a software emulator for backwards compatibility. (E.g., like the WOW component -- Windows on Windows -- that runs Windows 3.1 16-bit software on 32-bit Windows systems. (Hopefully OS 5.0's emulator will run better than WOW.))

Given this, Palm OS 5.0 would be a logical point for Handspring to break all ties with Palm, i.e., start using their own OS -- as long as they, too, have an emulator for current Palm software. (Maybe that's all they license from Palm.)

----
My own suspicion is that Visors this year will be released with Palm OS 4.0 (e.g., "4.0H" -- altered for Springboards), so that BlueTooth modules/software can be used on the Visor. But I could really see Palm OS 5.0 be the point where Handspring decides to get off the Palm OS train.

__________________
Jeff Meyer

"And he died like he lived: with his mouth wide open."

Registered: Nov 1999
Location: Enumclaw, Wa
Posts: 268

I personally hand no idea when theyre going to switch to their own OS. But it seems pretty obvious to me that they will soon because of the slow growth of the Palm OS.

__________________
God bless the USA! The country I love, and will support at all costs.

Registered: May 2000
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1429

In differnt Articles, Jeff and Donna have always said that they would like to keeep there options open. They have 3 years left on there liscence with Palm, before they choose to renew it. in 3 years, OS 5.1 should be difinantly out So I think HAnd will at least until 2004 have Palm on there deivces, but they might introduce a PPC device..


Remeber some problems. Al lspringboards have Palm OS programming on them. Now if springboard's code wer eall done in a language similar to java, than handspring would jsut need to right a different runtime, and therefore springboards would be cross compatiable.


PPC is godo for multimedia, and it looks liek half of the springboards are going that direction, while the other half are going wiht more bisniuss things that the palm OS better handles. (VisorPhone)

Handspring is a great company. There killir product is the Springboard slot. The Visor is a awesome handheld, but it's the springboard slot which makes handspring unique.

__________________
-miradu

Registered: Sep 2000
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 501

quote:

---

Originally posted by miradu2000
Remeber some problems. Al lspringboards have Palm OS programming on them.

---

__________________
Jeff Meyer

"And he died like he lived: with his mouth wide open."

Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Them Twin Cities
Posts: 1758

quote:

---

Originally posted by bookrats


I don't think that would be a significant problem, if the Palm software emulator is enabled to execute code from Springboard modules. I.e., just as current Palm software would be run on a ARM-based Visor using an emulator, software on current Handspring modules would be recognized and run using the same emulator.

---

__________________
Don't like somebody? Click "Profile" on a post and then click "Ignore "so and so's" posts". Voila!

Registered: Jan 2000
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 1683

I don't think they's stray from the Palm OS for a number reasons, the least of which is simply market penetration. People are VERY reluctant to switch OSs, regardless of the merits of a newer one.

Besides, they make much more $$ selling hardware than software. Why mess with that?

What I would like Handspring to do is perhaps enhance the OS. Stick to the basic philosphies of the Palm OS but take it from there.

__________________
We're all naked if you turn us inside out.
-David Byrne

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 41

quote:

---

Originally posted by dietrichbohn


What makes PalmOS so neat is its speed, and I think an emulator would slow that down...

I gotta say, I'm dreading the day 5.0 comes out. If that emulator isn't supafly, then we've got slower devices (at worst) or platforms that are a pain to share (at best).

---

__________________
<img src="http://www.handspring.com/products/visorprism/images/PrsmLgPct02.jpg" align="left" width="115" height="115">Brent Dax
[email protected]

Visor Prism, USB recharging cradle, Win2K
I wish I could post from AvantGo...

<B><-- Cobalt Blue is really cool!</B>

Registered: Nov 2000
Location:
Posts: 714

I want my color Edge with v5.0 & 32mb of RAM now!

__________________
Matt Nichols
[email protected]

Registered: Sep 2000
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 501

quote:

---

Originally posted by homer
I don't think they's stray from the Palm OS for a number reasons, the least of which is simply market penetration. People are VERY reluctant to switch OSs, regardless of the merits of a newer one.

---

__________________
Jeff Meyer

"And he died like he lived: with his mouth wide open."