DaBuzz
Member
Registered: Sep 1999
Location:
Posts: 27 |
I'm of the opinion that the Visor's TCO would be as much if not MORE than the Palms for the simple fact that their are more moving parts for the client to break/require support for.
Take the example of floppy-less workstations ... they have less support costs since you no longer have jammed floppy calls.
With the Visor, the springboard is a major aspect of the unit so you can expect it to get more usage than a standard floppy disk drive.
Then add to that, lost, stolen, dropped, and generally broken springboard modules and the TCO is not looking too good from a corporate standpoint.
One other thing to think about is USB ... it's not everywhere so if you deploy a Visor, you have to a) have 100% USB deployment, or b) buy serial cradles for those without it. Such a task is not easy with 5,000 or so users since you must first IDENTIFY who needs serial and who can use USB. All of this legwork costs money, money which is directly computed into the TCO of each unit. Then you have to buy the serial cradles which is even more cost.
It's odd to think of TCO in regards to the Visor anyway since it seems generally marketed towards a consumer market, not a corporate market where TCO is important.
------------------
Wes Salmon
PDA Buzz Guy
www.pdabuzz.com
|