VisorCentral.com - You are garbage...

Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »
Show 20 posts from this thread on one page

VisorCentral.com (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/index.php)
- Off Topic (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=6)
-- You are garbage... (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/showthread.php?threadid=24294)

Posted by ernieba1 on 07-01-2002 01:25 PM:

Hmmmmm, this changes things.

Question: How did you discover Visorcentral.com?

__________________
-Bernie

"One word sums up probably the responsibility of any vice president, and that one word is 'to be prepared'.
-Dan Quayle

Posted by PDAENVY on 07-01-2002 02:23 PM:

ertonbel,
what are the pictures supposed to be of?

__________________
Jeff

Posted by Toby on 07-01-2002 02:30 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ernieba1
Hmmmmm, this changes things.

Why? I've seen pictures of the Loch Ness Monster. What exactly do those pictures prove?

quote:
Question: How did you discover Visorcentral.com?

Better Question: Why say anything here when the newsmedia would be a better place for such a story if it were true? I bet they're in on the conspiracy.

Posted by Toby on 07-01-2002 02:39 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by PDAENVY
what are the pictures supposed to be of?

Jeff, you're part of the conspiracy, too? I must've missed your name on the newsletter.

Posted by PDAENVY on 07-01-2002 04:20 PM:

Now that I think about it, I'm surprised that no one has cited the law of parsimony (derived from Occam's Razor), which states:

quote:
if you have two theories which both explain the observed facts then you should use the simplest until more evidence comes along.

__________________
Jeff

Posted by Toby on 07-01-2002 05:47 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by PDAENVY
Now that I think about it, I'm surprised that no one has cited the law of parsimony (derived from Occam's Razor), which states:

One thing makes the substance of that page questionable for me. It attributes a quote to Einstein of which there exists no proof of his saying (source: The Expanded Quotable Einstein).

Posted by K. Cannon on 07-01-2002 05:55 PM:

oops!

Toby:
You just had to bring up Einstein in this thread, didn't you!!

Posted by Toby on 07-01-2002 06:15 PM:

Re: oops!

quote:
Originally posted by K. Cannon
You just had to bring up Einstein in this thread, didn't you!!

Trolling is a respectable way to make a living here on the Bayou.

Posted by John Nowak on 07-01-2002 06:40 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ernieba1
Hmmmmm, this changes things.

I don't think so -- all I saw was tiny pictures of an emergency vehicle and a policeman in SWAT gear. Heck, anyone unfortunate enough to be near an arrest could have taken them.

Posted by K. Cannon on 07-01-2002 06:42 PM:

Re: Re: oops!

quote:
Originally posted by Toby
Trolling is a respectable way to make a living here on the Bayou.

I knew it!!

Posted by Toby on 07-01-2002 06:54 PM:

Re: Re: Re: oops!

quote:
Originally posted by K. Cannon
I knew it!!

You want to buy some shrimp, cher?

Posted by Pathdoc on 07-01-2002 07:45 PM:

Ertonbel is correct about one thing he stated in an earlier post, NY can involuntarily hold someone without a court proceeding for longer than 72 hours (they can hold someone for 60 days). They are required to have a court hearing within 5 days of a request by the individual being held. Ertonbel, if you requested it and they didn't do it, then you have grounds to go after them.

Interestingly, NY also requires statements from two physicians to get an involuntary commitment.

Here is a link to the appropriate statute.

__________________
Donate Blood!!!
Visit here to see how: America's Blood Centers

Posted by K. Cannon on 07-01-2002 07:53 PM:

Re: Re: Re: Re: oops!

quote:
Originally posted by Toby
You want to buy some shrimp, cher?

Non, merci. Shrimp boats here in S.C. were part of a conspiracy to do away with red meat eaters.

Posted by Toby on 07-01-2002 07:57 PM:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: oops!

quote:
Originally posted by K. Cannon
Non, merci. Shrimp boats here in S.C. were part of a conspiracy to do away with red meat eaters.

That's them Texiens for you. Does alligator count as red meat?

Posted by K. Cannon on 07-01-2002 08:17 PM:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: oops!

quote:
Originally posted by Toby
That's them Texiens for you. Does alligator count as red meat?

Not sure about the Texiens--are they part of a conspiracy, too?

I've heard that Alligator tastes like chicken, so probably no on the red meat.

Posted by Toby on 07-01-2002 08:24 PM:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: oops!

quote:
Originally posted by K. Cannon
Not sure about the Texiens

You should know. You are one.

quote:
--are they part of a conspiracy, too?

I'm sure they are.

quote:
I've heard that Alligator tastes like chicken,

It doesn't. It tastes like Tasty Wheat.

quote:
so probably no on the red meat.

Oh well. Must be a cattle rancher conspiracy. Nutria - it's what's for dinner!

Posted by John Nowak on 07-01-2002 09:27 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by tantousha
it is true that since the incident something like 5000 people have disappeared without arrest warrants and are currently being held indefinitly.

quote:
Washington Post, June 28
According to the most recent government figures, 74 foreign nationals are still being held on immigration charges related to the Sept. 11 attacks. At least 700 people have been detained on immigration charges since Sept. 11, and many have been deported.

Just keep talking, tantousha -- someday you'll say something right.
What's your source for "5000 detainees?"
What's your source for "The news agency that filmed the Palestinians celebrating the September 11 attacks later admitted the film had been made earlier?"
Inquiring minds want to know.

Posted by Toby on 07-01-2002 09:41 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by John Nowak
Just keep talking, tantousha -- someday you'll say something right.
What's your source for "5000 detainees?" [...]

Maybe that's in Canada.

Posted by Hoser_back_home on 07-01-2002 09:57 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Toby
Maybe that's in Canada.

i don't think so, we don't have the resources to deal with 5000 'detainees'!

__________________
Ever feel like the train left while you were busy reading the paper?

Stealth-Mod.

Posted by Toby on 07-01-2002 10:43 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Hoser_back_home
i don't think so, we don't have the resources to deal with 5000 'detainees'!

I agree. If history is any indicator, Canada would not detain them (not that the alternative is necessarily preferable

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:20 PM.

Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »
Show 20 posts from this thread on one page