VisorCentral.com
Show 20 posts from this thread on one page

VisorCentral.com (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/index.php)
- Article Comments (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=17)
-- Ansyr PDF Viewer (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/showthread.php?threadid=7945)


Posted by JHromadka on 09-07-2000 09:33 PM:

Arrow

Discuss your comments on the new PDF viewer here.

__________________
James Hromadka
Old Friend


Posted by miradu on 09-07-2000 09:44 PM:

PDF is priporitory right?
We should find an open source standerd for viewing fiels on a palm.

-miradu2000

a VC article a day keeps the boredom away


Posted by VTL on 09-08-2000 12:24 AM:

James:

Are you planning to do a review of this product? I've got AportisDoc, which is free to non-commercial users. It works fine, but you lose the formating and other graphics capability. The new viewer sounds great, but it's not free (I think it was around $25 when I checked), and there's no trial version that I could see.


Posted by Gameboy70 on 09-08-2000 01:27 AM:

Lightbulb

quote:
Originally posted by miradu2000 PDF is priporitory right?
We should find an open source standerd for viewing fiels on a palm.


Two open source file formats that might do the trick are the W3C's .svg and Macromedia's .swf (the company open sourced it over a year ago). Both are scalable vector graphic formats.

But to read .pdf's, you'd have to reverse-engineer that file format rather than reinvent the wheel with .svg or .swf. I think there's a GNU PDF reader for *nix (and maybe even Win32), but porting it to the Palm would be no small amount of work.


Posted by miradu on 09-08-2000 02:06 AM:

Thank You gameboy. I do have the linux GPL PDF reader, and stuff. but one of my big concerns, is not viewing, but CREATING. Adobe charges like 100 dollars for the simplest PDF creation. Hmm I though Vetor graphics were for Animation. I should learn more

-miradu2000
A VC article a day keeps the boredom away


Posted by BEN on 09-08-2000 02:50 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by miradu2000
Thank You gameboy. I do have the linux GPL PDF reader, and stuff. but one of my big concerns, is not viewing, but CREATING. Adobe charges like 100 dollars for the simplest PDF creation. Hmm I though Vetor graphics were for Animation. I should learn more

-miradu2000
A VC article a day keeps the boredom away



The problem is that not many other people are going to be able to, or want to read your files if you use a different program to creat it than PDF. I personally would be willing to try out new technologies, but alot of other people arn't so open. But...if you want to use the files for yourself, then go for it.
BEN


Posted by Gameboy70 on 09-08-2000 08:39 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by miradu2000 Thank You gameboy. I do have the linux GPL PDF reader, and stuff. but one of my big concerns, is not viewing, but CREATING. Adobe charges like 100 dollars for the simplest PDF creation. Hmm I though Vetor graphics were for Animation. I should learn more


Animation is only one feature of scalable vector graphics. The key advantage of vector graphics technologies (like PostScript) is that, unlike bitmapped graphics, images can be scaled to size without changing the file size. If there is indeed a GLP'ed PDF reader, then I can't see why it wouldn't be possible to take the code for the filter and figure out how to create an authoring tool out of it.

But then you have a problem: the old "It's just a simple matter of programming" clich� (translation: easier said than done). Another problem is that Adobe's pretty hardcore about on IP issues. They sued Macromedia for over a GUI issue (GUI patents are even more ridiculous than 1-Click Ordering). If Acrobat technology is patented, as I presume it is, then the GPL won't shield you from litigation -- as the recent ruling on DeCSS demonstrates.


Posted by nwhitfield on 09-08-2000 09:02 AM:

Open source is all very well...

quote:
Originally posted by miradu2000
We should find an open source standerd for viewing fiels on a palm.



While I'm sure that's a terribly noble view, let's join the real world here, eh?

There are lots of files out there with important information in PDF format - technical support information, user guides, government reports and plenty more things.

Even the text of the Northern Ireland peace agreement is available as a full colour PDF from the web site.

Frankly, if someone's producing a PDF reader for PalmOS that can cope with documents like that, including their graphics, I think that should be applauded.

There are plenty of other ways to read documents on your Visor if you don't want to use anything proprietary. Personally, I want access to some of those documents, and while I think open source is a great idea, I'm also a realist. I really don't think you're going to get the Northern Ireland office, or countless companies around the world to produce documents in a minority format for PalmOS any time soon.

Nigel.


Posted by Gameboy70 on 09-10-2000 05:50 AM:

The superobjective should be to create an open source authoring tool for PDFs in general, not for the Palm in particular. Obviously, nobody needs to author PDFs on a Palm! So that's two separate projects: create a open source PDF authoring tool on the PC (*nix, Win32, Mac, BeOS), and port the existing open source PDF reader to the Palm.

I'm don't think that all software needs to be free, but I can appreciate the need to loosen a company's monopoly on such a ubiquitous publishing format. But as I've said, Adobe's no shrinking violet when it comes to IP. If you do write the code, you'd probably have to distribute it from a foreign server, like they did with PGP.


Posted by nwhitfield on 09-10-2000 11:05 AM:

PDF writing free

Well, I have a little program on the Mac called PrintToPDF which is $20 shareware. The unregistered version will certainly manage to turn my invoices into PDFs that I can email to clients without any problems.

And as the author says, he's not heard from Adobe's lawyers yet.

The PDF spec is available online at

Nigel.


Posted by ASPGuy on 09-18-2000 04:48 AM:

Ansyr PDF viewer - NOT what you may think

After purchasing the Ansyr PDF viewer, I could not be more disappointed. If there is a wayto download a demo, I could not find it, so I bought it. One (1) page took 105k of memory. THAT's REDICULOUS! And don't think that you can put a pdf book on your Visor either; before relizing how much memory it would take to convert, I converted a 495 page book to pdf and it took OVER 20 MG!!! Documents to Go has the same doc at 600k in text format.


I called them and asked for my money back. I was the first to ask for my money back and they didn't know quite how to handle that, but they did credit my credit card back the amount that I paid for it.


Also, though they allow for 3 different "brightness" levels during conversion, the brightest was very dim. Very difficult to read, and the text was choppy too. Don't mean to sound down and out about this product, but be CERTAIN you evaluate teh demo before forking over that kind of money. Very disappointed.

__________________
tc.


Posted by BEN on 09-19-2000 02:57 AM:

20 megs, that's insane. Buy the Minijam just to put books on it.
BEN


Posted by adenoid on 09-19-2000 06:12 PM:

Angry

Interestingly, the PDF reader from Ansyr that runs under WindowsCE comes with a 30 day demo period. The Palm version didn't have any demo, you had to buy it first.

(Marketing?)

Thanks to ASPGuy for finding out the uselessness of this product. Sorry you had to go to such hassles.


Posted by adenoid on 09-28-2000 07:19 PM:

Red face A Change of Heart?

Interestingly, now the Primer for Palm DOES come with a 30-day evaluation period. In my opinion, it is only useful for small diagrams. Not really worth $50.


Posted by ASPGuy on 09-28-2000 07:22 PM:

Spare Me!

adenoid, CERTAINLY not worth $50.00. $50.00, think of it. . . . $50.00!!!!

__________________
tc.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 PM.
Show 20 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.4
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2016.