VisorCentral.com Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show 20 posts from this thread on one page

VisorCentral.com (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/index.php)
- Springboard Modules (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=10)
-- VisorPhone Discussion (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/showthread.php?threadid=8271)


Posted by Felipe on 09-26-2000 06:25 PM:

Re: Re: belt clip and visorphone

quote:
Originally posted by Gameboy70
[QUOTE] But for now, I wish someone would come up with a better solution to carrying these things than belt clips.


They did. Your pocket.:-)

__________________
Felipe Garcia
Happy Treo 600 user, so far. Thanx Cingular for having an unlocked phone.

My Treo 600 is my phone, my PDA, my watch, and my MP3 player. Oh yeah, I take a picture once in a while with it. Convergence is such a great thing.


Posted by pmax on 09-26-2000 07:15 PM:

Too much too late

I'm not sold on this new hybird. The benefits I see from
a cell phone would be light internet related activities.
Normal cell phone use, such as meeting up with a friend,
conducting business, or other such calls does not warrent
a PDA.

How hard would it be to make a simple cable connecting the
major phones to the springboard port? You get the all the
functionality of your normal phone, plus the access, when
needed, for tasks like flight checks or the like.

Any opinions?


Posted by Gameboy70 on 09-26-2000 07:42 PM:

pmax:

Simple question, but the answers are too involved to reiterate here. There's a very detailed discussion about connecting a cell phone on the RS232 to cellphone connection thread. In addition to the two serial cables that should be available for connecting a cell phone, the SixPak will enable this on selected phones as well.

The VisorPhone comes with a modem, so you won't need to buy a landline modem or a SixPax to connect to the internet. Another key advantage of the VisorPhone is being able to use Graffiti for SMS messaging, as opposed to composing text messages on a numeric keypad (which is awful, even with predictive text entry). I never use SMS on my current phone for this reason, but if I could write messages, I'd use it all the time. The ability to send asynchronous messages is often far more economical, efficient and convenient than voice calling. And with the modem, you have a choice of browsers for connecting to the net; you're not stuck with some horrible WAP microbrowser.


Posted by Celchu19 on 09-27-2000 01:00 AM:

As I understand this the Visor Phone (if you have an ISP) is just as good as a wireless module, it works a a 14.4 modem where as I belive that the Minstral S is a 19.2 modem, i think that that little itsy bitty bit of speed can be sacrificed because you get a nice cell phoneout of the deal, not to mention that the module is cheeper, smaller and better on battires.


sam

__________________
Sam Kleinman

PocketPCThoughts.com
CollectiveArts
Free-ePress
Musings of a Teal Artist
CollectiveArts TechMusings

"Everybody don't like something and we all don't like you." -- Richard Thompson, Hard Luck Stories


Posted by Gameboy70 on 09-27-2000 08:10 AM:

Thumbs up

quote:
Originally posted by Celchu19
As I understand this the Visor Phone (if you have an ISP) is just as good as a wireless module, it works a a 14.4 modem where as I belive that the Minstral S is a 19.2 modem, i think that that little itsy bitty bit of speed can be sacrificed because you get a nice cell phoneout of the deal, not to mention that the module is cheeper, smaller and better on battires.


Exactly. My whole reason for going with choosing the Visor in the first place was to have a range of competitive wireless solutions, rather than to be locked into one technology or one provider like the Palm VII. Within a year, we'll see GSM, CDMA, CDPD and GPRS options for the Visor. I was waiting for the Minstrel S, but why pay $70 more for a little extra bandwidth and no voice capabilities?


Posted by Celchu19 on 09-27-2000 12:14 PM:

glad someone aggrees with me, now all I need to know is how much the service costs.

__________________
Sam Kleinman

PocketPCThoughts.com
CollectiveArts
Free-ePress
Musings of a Teal Artist
CollectiveArts TechMusings

"Everybody don't like something and we all don't like you." -- Richard Thompson, Hard Luck Stories


Posted by zelchenko on 09-27-2000 02:54 PM:

Thumbs down state of technology not ready for me

I will not be looking to converge my PDA with my cell phone unless I am able to do so without sacrificing the ability to expand memory or access other network services WHILE talking on the phone.


Posted by GORDYmac on 09-27-2000 08:25 PM:

Thumbs up The Flash demo states...

You can dial into your ISP and browse and check email at 14Kbps. Not screaming fast, but neat nonetheless.

I haven't bought a PDA since my PalmPilot Professional (which I bought after my Palm III was lost), but I think convergence is good. Once the Prism arrives, I'm taking the big dive.

Also, the $299 includes a service plan, so the only addition should be a $15-40 monthly service charge. The more options you add (call waiting, caller ID, three way calling, etc.) the more you'll pay. Basic calling features are in the $15 range in my area, where BellSouth is a major carrier.


Posted by zelchenko on 09-27-2000 08:42 PM:

Thumbs down the FAQ states....

That you cannot access programs that require network services. I want to be able to use PQAs while talking on the phone. This is still a ways off. Therefore, I will keep my separate cellphone and will consider getting a wireless IP modem.


Posted by lacherclp on 09-28-2000 02:23 PM:

Lightbulb VisorPhone vs. Minstrel S

I think everyone's missing some big points when considering using the VisorPhone to do dial-up internet access.

1) If you use the VisorPhone to dial-up, then your visor is basically acting as an alternate to a traditional desktop computer - with one big exception - you're using cellular airtime to do this! I have a WAP enabled phone - and when I first come WAP services for my phone I went a bit nuts using it, until I got my cell phone bill and realized all that lovely silly information searching was eating up my airtime.

2) When you use a cellular modem like the Minstrel S, combined with a service like OmniSky, it's not just that you're getting internet access. What you're getting is:
- CONSTANT available connectivity. For example, when
you've got an e-mail, a little notice light on
the modem will blink.

- Web surfing without clipping. You can use the OmniSky
browser to check ANY site, and have it instantly
optimized on the fly to display in the PDA browser.

- Add to that the fact that OmniSky is $40 a month for
unlimited usage, and things start to make more sense.
Also, OmniSky has traditionally given big discounts to
other customers who sign a year contract. (For example,
you can get a $300 Minstrel V modem for $150 with the
rebate.)

The reason I know so much about OmniSky is that as a contractor, I'm just finishing up some work at Aether Systems, one of the companies which owns OmniSky, and whose backbone is used to serve the OmniSky service. (And before anyone asks, NO I can't get you free OmniSky service, I can't even get it for myself! My last day at Aether is tomorrow anyhow!)


3) Now don't get me wrong - the VisorPhone is BEYOND cool. And if I were to have ONLY one springboard, AND didn't have a phone - this would definitely be the one I'd get. But the fact is I DO have a very nice cell phone, which I NEED to be constantly available. What happens when I want to use my HandyGPS, OmniRemote, or SoundsGood? Sure the price of the VisorPhone is high, but for me the real negative is the opportunity cost of not being able to use my other modules. I think a cell phone module, to be effective, would have to be your only one.

__________________
--Steven Lacher


Posted by Winchell on 09-28-2000 02:35 PM:

Cool

quote:
Originally posted by Gameboy70
But for now, I wish someone would come up with a better solution to carrying these things than belt clips.

Oh, but they did!
That was the entire idea behind the E-Holster.
http://www.eholster.com/

Of course, I wouldn't go grabbing for your Visor around a nervous law enforcement officer. And I hope you enjoy looking like James Bond.

The Landware Burropac is similar, but more modestly priced. That's the one I use.

__________________
<pre> ^<br> /_\ WINCHELL CHUNG Nyrath the nearly wise at the Praeternatural Tower<br> <(*)> [email protected] http://www.ProjectRho.com/home.html<br>/_/|\_\ ABSIT INVIDIA VERBO IDEM SONANS<br> //|\\ -------------------------------------------------------------------<br>SURREAL SAGE SEZ: I'm nobody. Nobody at all. But the secrets of the<br>universe don't mind. They reveal themselves to nobodies who care.<br></pre>


Posted by Winchell on 09-28-2000 02:42 PM:

Question

quote:
Originally posted by GORDYmac
Also, the $299 includes a service plan, so the only addition should be a $15-40 monthly service charge.

Are you sure about that? I thought that the VisorPhone was $299 with a service plan, and $499 without.

$200 is an awfully large bonus.

It seems to me that you'll get your VisorPhone for $299 as long as you pay an additional $200 or so to purchase a service plan.

I'd be happy to be proven wrong on this.

__________________
<pre> ^<br> /_\ WINCHELL CHUNG Nyrath the nearly wise at the Praeternatural Tower<br> <(*)> [email protected] http://www.ProjectRho.com/home.html<br>/_/|\_\ ABSIT INVIDIA VERBO IDEM SONANS<br> //|\\ -------------------------------------------------------------------<br>SURREAL SAGE SEZ: I'm nobody. Nobody at all. But the secrets of the<br>universe don't mind. They reveal themselves to nobodies who care.<br></pre>


Posted by John Nowak on 09-28-2000 04:42 PM:

Re: VisorPhone vs. Minstrel S

quote:
Originally posted by lacherclp
I think everyone's missing some big points when considering using the VisorPhone to do dial-up internet access.



Sounds like overlapping functionality to me -- if you want a continuous internet link on your PDA, get a Minstrel; if you don't see a need to spend a great deal of time on the Internet and you want the cell phone, get the VisorPhone.

Personally, I don't see the problem with being able to use one Springboard at a time -- I really doubt that I'm going to be talking on the phone while simultaniously listening to MP3s, but I could see that someone who does need a cell phone which offers 24/7 availability would be better off with a separate unit.


Posted by Gameboy70 on 09-28-2000 10:36 PM:

Re: Re: VisorPhone vs. Minstrel S

quote:
Sounds like overlapping functionality to me -- if you want a continuous internet link on your PDA, get a Minstrel; if you don't see a need to spend a great deal of time on the Internet and you want the cell phone, get the VisorPhone.


As someone who had every intention of getting the Minstrel, I don't see the advantage over the VisorPhone. I don't see what the amount of time you spend on the internet has to do with it.

The Minstrel costs $369, and the VisorPhone costs $299. The Minstrel has a 19.2k connection, while the VP offers a 14.4k connection -- a difference I consider negligible. In addition to email and the web, you can use the VP for SMS, so people can access your messages through their existing cell phones.

And correct me if I'm wrong on this, but the Minstrel CDPD connection isn't any more "continuous" the a GSM or CDMA/TDMA live connection -- as opposed to GPRS, which is a persistent connection (i.e. GPRS is an "always on" internet connection; with CDPD, GSM, and CDMA you have to log in).


Posted by John Nowak on 09-28-2000 10:55 PM:

Re: Re: Re: VisorPhone vs. Minstrel S

quote:
Originally posted by Gameboy70
As someone who had every intention of getting the Minstrel, I don't see the advantage over the VisorPhone. I don't see what the amount of time you spend on the internet has to do with it.



Lacher stated in an earlier post that "OmniSky is $40 a month for unlimited usage."


Posted by hcj13 on 09-29-2000 05:12 AM:

Question battery life

What about battery life for the Visor?

I wonder how fast will the Visor phone eat up your battery. Or will it contain a battery pack for it self. If the battery consumption is large then it would seem pointless to use it as a regular cell phone since Visor is not rechargable yet.


Posted by ToolkiT on 09-29-2000 05:28 AM:

Re: battery life

quote:
Originally posted by hcj13
What about battery life for the Visor?

I wonder how fast will the Visor phone eat up your battery. Or will it contain a battery pack for it self. If the battery consumption is large then it would seem pointless to use it as a regular cell phone since Visor is not rechargable yet.




see the visorphone specs

VisorPhone comes with:

VisorPhone module
Rechargeable 680 mAh Lithium ion battery
Travel charger
User's guide
SIM card **
Service plan and customer care
information **
** may be provided separately in some cases

__________________
<IMG WIDTH="200" HEIGHT="50" SRC=http://www.visorcentral.com/images/visorcentral.gif> VisorCentral Discussion Moderator
Do files get embarrassed when they get unzipped?


Posted by cutey on 10-08-2000 04:34 PM:

Question

anybody know when a version of a visorphone for asia, will be available.... i read somewhere that it will be available by 2001...i cant wait anymore....


Posted by Rob on 10-08-2000 08:43 PM:

Re: Re: VisorPhone vs. Minstrel S

quote:
Originally posted by John Nowak
Personally, I don't see the problem with being able to use one Springboard at a time -- I really doubt that I'm going to be talking on the phone while simultaniously listening to MP3s, but I could see that someone who does need a cell phone which offers 24/7 availability would be better off with a separate unit.



I think this is a very important issue for those considering the VisorPhone. If you like to be 'on call' all the time, then you can only ever use the VisorPhone module (and are probably better off with a seperate cellphone). However, if you are like me and don't mind letting calls go to voicemail when you're listening to MP3s on the train then the VisorPhone module makes more sense (nobody likes people who talk on their cellphones while riding the train anyway). The times that I do need to be accessible (like when I'm away at a trade show or something), I wouldn't usually be using a GPS or MP3 module anyway, so leaving the VisorPhone plugged-in makes sense.


Posted by zero on 10-09-2000 10:46 PM:

Lightbulb

I think the Visor Phone is a great idea. I don't think that I going to run out out and get one just yet. I remember when I saw my first Palm, then the Palm Pilot 1000. I thought it was a really neat gadget that would satisfy my needs for a good organizer. At the time though I thought they were a bit pricey. I waited and bought one when the price came down. Now I'm a big fan. I look at the Visor phone in the same fashion, I think it has a usefule purpose, but the price just isn't right, at least for me, yet. I can see in a year or two this will mature into a much better product, but the point is that it has to start somewhere. Part of introducing new products is to release them to the mass market and adjust the design as the market dictates, you can only get some much done with beta testing.

The one thing that would make sense to me though would be to have a solution (wired or wireless) that allowed you to interface with your current cell phone and send a phone number from your Visor address book to the phone to dial. As I see it cell phones have a great form factor for a phone, the Visor has great form factor for a PDA. Why not marry the two without sacrificing form? Just a though, but I believe it to a be a good one.


-Kevin


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:46 AM. Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show 20 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.4
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2016.