VisorCentral.com Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show 20 posts from this thread on one page

VisorCentral.com (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/index.php)
- Off Topic (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=6)
-- Space Shuttle Columbia (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/showthread.php?threadid=31931)


Posted by Leeladisky on 02-01-2003 06:40 PM:

Off Topic :-(

To those on the Columbia and their families, our thoughts are with you.

Sadly,

L

__________________
Lee Ladisky


Posted by MarkEagle on 02-01-2003 07:36 PM:

Space Shuttle Columbia

A moment of silence in memory of the seven astronauts involved in this morning's tragic events...







...but for the grace of God go I.

__________________


Posted by Tom LaPrise on 02-02-2003 02:04 AM:

Since the Apollo days, I've wanted to go into space. Pushing 40 now, I'd still give anything to go. I suspect Columbia's final crew had the same attitude.


May God comfort their families and friends.

__________________
"Yeah, he can talk. It's gettin' him to shut up that's the trick!"
-Shrek


Posted by fixitgal on 02-02-2003 02:09 AM:

Thoughts

My thoughts and prayers are with the astronauts families, both of the Columbia and the Challenger. It must bring back all the pain for those families of the Challenger astronauts.

__________________
"When I am Empress...Heads will roll!"
Queen of Parts


Posted by miradu on 02-02-2003 02:20 AM:

*sigh* What another sad day for America... If budget spending was never to be cut, wouldn't we be using the x33 by now? (horrid grammer there.. sorry)

I was told of it happening at 9 AM CST, when i was in the audtiroium before a huge chior thing i was doing.. Within a minute i had the rueters report up with mroe info than we were told sharing with my friends. MY monthly service bill just paid for itself there.

__________________
-miradu


Posted by ToolkiT on 02-03-2003 12:53 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by miradu
*sigh* What another sad day for America... If budget spending was never to be cut, wouldn't we be using the x33 by now?

If more money went from the defense dept into the space program, maybe this could have been prevented... but hindsight is always... 20 20 :/

The most sad thing I found that unlike the chalanger these guys were allmost home.. just a few minutes away... very tragic...

__________________
<IMG WIDTH="200" HEIGHT="50" SRC=http://www.visorcentral.com/images/visorcentral.gif> VisorCentral Discussion Moderator
Do files get embarrassed when they get unzipped?


Posted by dick-richardson on 02-03-2003 02:11 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by ToolkiT
The most sad thing I found that unlike the chalanger these guys were allmost home.. just a few minutes away... very tragic...

I find that to be the most comforting. They were able to enjoy one of the most sought after experiences known to man. The Challenger crew died in anticipation.

__________________
-Joshua
Abortion: Darwinism at its finest.


Posted by ToolkiT on 02-03-2003 02:15 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by dick-richardson

I find that to be the most comforting. They were able to enjoy one of the most sought after experiences known to man. The Challenger crew died in anticipation.



That is also true... either way it is very sad this happened..

__________________
<IMG WIDTH="200" HEIGHT="50" SRC=http://www.visorcentral.com/images/visorcentral.gif> VisorCentral Discussion Moderator
Do files get embarrassed when they get unzipped?


Posted by Winchell on 02-03-2003 02:23 AM:

Unhappy

Let the sweet fresh breezes heal me
As they rove around the girth
Of our lovely mother planet
Of the cool, green hills of Earth.

We rot in the molds of Venus,
We retch at her tainted breath.
Foul are her flooded jungles,
Crawling with unclean death.

[ --- the harsh bright soil of Luna ---
--- Saturn's rainbow rings ---
--- the frozen night of Titan --- ]


We've tried each spinning space mote
And reckoned its true worth:
Take us back again to the homes of men
On the cool, green hills of Earth.

The arching sky is calling
Spacemen back to their trade.
ALL HANDS! STAND BY! FREE FALLING!
And the lights below us fade.

Out ride the sons of Terra,
Far drives the thundering jet,
Up leaps a race of Earthmen,
Out, far, and onward yet ---

We pray for one last landing
On the globe that gave us birth;
Let us rest our eyes on the fleecy skies
And the cool, green hills of Earth.

-- Robert A. Heinlein


Posted by Winchell on 02-03-2003 02:27 AM:

Gus, Roger, Ed...

Dick, Mike, El, Judy, Ron, Greg, Christa...

Vladimir, Georgi, Viktor, Vladislav...

Take care of your new brothers and sisters for us, willya?


Posted by dick-richardson on 02-03-2003 03:24 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by ToolkiT
That is also true... either way it is very sad this happened..

Undoubtedly...

__________________
-Joshua
Abortion: Darwinism at its finest.


Posted by John Nowak on 02-03-2003 08:23 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by miradu
*sigh* What another sad day for America... If budget spending was never to be cut, wouldn't we be using the x33 by now? (horrid grammer there.. sorry)


It is a very sad day indeed, and don't worry about the grammar.

However, I'd argue that X-33 / Venture Star was doomed from the start. I recall very well that the decision to go with X-33 instewad of Clipper-X was greeted with incredulity on virtually every space chatboard I saw. X-33 was an incredibly aggressive and speculative project, relying heavily on the development of materials technology that simply doesn't exist just now. X-33 was cut out of the budget because the technical challenges of building its fuel tanks appeared insurmountable; it was not cut out of the budget because it was an expensive, though promising, approach.

This doesn't mean that we shouldn't be supporting NASA more than we are, but X-33 was more of a technical failure than a political failure.


Posted by yardie on 02-08-2003 12:35 PM:

Arrow

Is there really a *need* for humans to go to space? Its not that we are venturing very far out of the earth's atmosphere anyhow.

__________________
My life is in my Treo... Where is yours?


Posted by Appleman on 02-08-2003 01:48 PM:

It's all baby steps. You can't just build one vehicle and launch and travel everywhere. From each success and each failure they learn something. Remember the Space program is not just for travelling, it is also for performing scientific experiments in a weightless environment, communications etc.

And humans may not be physically venturing outside the atmosphere, but there are many "robots" or "probes" that are. This time next year, there will be two new Rovers scooting around Mars. It's all so fascinating.


Posted by Tom LaPrise on 02-08-2003 04:06 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by yardie
Is there really a *need* for humans to go to space? Its not that we are venturing very far out of the earth's atmosphere anyhow.


And we didn't have to explore other continents or the oceans, and we didn't have to develop air travel. But we're human, and we seem programmed to test our boundaries and to see "what's out there" and actually GET out there eventually. For much of the actual science being done, we don't really have to put humans out in space... we do it because we can and we feel we should, and there will always be people who want to go no matter the risk.

__________________
"Yeah, he can talk. It's gettin' him to shut up that's the trick!"
-Shrek


Posted by KRamsauer on 02-08-2003 06:41 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Tom LaPrise


And we didn't have to explore other continents or the oceans, and we didn't have to develop air travel. But we're human, and we seem programmed to test our boundaries and to see "what's out there" and actually GET out there eventually.

Well put. There is something magic about sending people into space. It's humbling. It's uniting. Regardless of what goes on down here, we are all the same up there. It's like the squabbles you have with your family. Sure, they can be a pain, but as soon as an external force threatens your family, all those differences seem to melt away.

__________________
<a href="http://www.kurtramsauer.com">KurtRamsauer.com</a>


Posted by Tom LaPrise on 02-09-2003 01:58 AM:

I know NASA's people are looking at better pictures than the one released (taken by the Air Force telescope), but my own amateur observation is that the picture makes a whole lot more sense if you invert the colors so you're seeing a brightly-glowing shuttle against a dark sky. (I know it was daylight when the picture was taken, but the shuttle's glow would overpower that and the sky would appear dark by comparison.) Seen this way, the "jagged leading edge" everyone seems to be referring to on the left wing looks more like a brightening of the glow where the wing transitions into the "wing glove," indicating greater frictional heating (or maybe incandescence of material exposed by missing tiles) at that area--which is just ahead of and outboard of the wheel well door.

Early failures of brake line temperature sensors and later failure of landing-gear strut temperature sensor data makes sense--the landing gear "retracts" forward, putting the wheels ahead of the strut. Heat would get to the brakes before getting to the strut.

I wish they would publish more pictures from that telescope soon...

__________________
"Yeah, he can talk. It's gettin' him to shut up that's the trick!"
-Shrek


Posted by Digisane on 02-11-2003 01:59 AM:

Where can I see these hi-res images?

I've been on holiday on Jan 31st so I didn't know about the shuttle crash until 4 days later.

I had been following the developments aboard the Columbia on Space.com just the day before I left and the crew were happily talking about the homecoming trip. They never made it. It's just sad. The Columbia is also my favorite shuttle, partly it's the first space shuttle, and because I grew up watching it launch into space over and over again until this day with the word Columbia etched into my mind.


quote:
Originally posted by Tom LaPrise
I know NASA's people are looking at better pictures than the one released (taken by the Air Force telescope), but my own amateur observation is that the picture makes a whole lot more sense if you invert the colors so you're seeing a brightly-glowing shuttle against a dark sky. (I know it was daylight when the picture was taken, but the shuttle's glow would overpower that and the sky would appear dark by comparison.) Seen this way, the "jagged leading edge" everyone seems to be referring to on the left wing looks more like a brightening of the glow where the wing transitions into the "wing glove," indicating greater frictional heating (or maybe incandescence of material exposed by missing tiles) at that area--which is just ahead of and outboard of the wheel well door.

Early failures of brake line temperature sensors and later failure of landing-gear strut temperature sensor data makes sense--the landing gear "retracts" forward, putting the wheels ahead of the strut. Heat would get to the brakes before getting to the strut.

I wish they would publish more pictures from that telescope soon...

__________________
I'm just a dreamer..


Posted by Tom LaPrise on 02-11-2003 01:24 PM:

So far, only the one image has been released to the public. I found it on yahoo.com's front page; by now, you might have to do a little looking.

I'm still in shock about it. I remember watching Columbia's first launch in a college dorm room (with one of the guys who went on to help design the patch the final crew wore). Hard to believe it's gone...

__________________
"Yeah, he can talk. It's gettin' him to shut up that's the trick!"
-Shrek


Posted by K. Cannon on 02-11-2003 05:33 PM:

alternatively

quote:
Originally posted by KRamsauer
It's like the squabbles you have with your family. Sure, they can be a pain, but as soon as an external force threatens your family, all those differences seem to melt away.

This description reminds me less of space and more how most Americans seemed to feel after 9/11. (Sorry for the OT.)

It was very strange seeing another shuttle disaster unfold. I remember being in Tenth Grade Biology class watching the Challenger. I still find it incredible (when I really think about it) how far science has come in the last 30-40 years--but even modern science can't conquer death.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:41 PM. Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show 20 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.4
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2016.