mpkirby
Member
Registered: Mar 2001
Location:
Posts: 23 |
quote: I think I agree with you there Clark, 350MB's does seem much, and 1GB is almost impracticle. I think that if you download every single Palm file and database out there, the sum would not equal close to 1GB.
I'm working from memory here (no pun intended), but didn't Bill Gates once say "640k is enough for anybody" when asked about the inherit memory limitation in MS-DOS?
My point is this-- technical limitations breed limited thinking. Before computers could access gigabytes of information, nobody thought it would EVER be necessary for a home computer to have that much storage. And when those massive storage devices first came out, they WERE unnecessary, because nobody had to utilize that much storage, because nobody COULD before then, so computing solutions were built around that limitation. Heck, I remember when having 2 floppy drives was a necessity-- otherwise, how would you make a copy of something?
Of course, multi-GB hard drives have allowed software engineers to bloat their products with sloppy code and inefficient use of resources-- it's a two-edged sword. Overall, though, I think everyone will agree that today's home computer can do more and is more useful to home users than the home computer of 1992 (which was a state-of-the-art 486 with 4MB of RAM and a 210MB hard drive, btw).
What use would I have for 1GB of storage on my Visor Prism? I have no idea-- but I'm excited about finding out!
-kirb
__________________
All Children Are A Gift From God...
...return unopened for a full refund.
|