homer
Member

Registered: Jan 2000
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 1683 |
quote:
Homer, I think you might stand alone saying that ColdFusion isn't the culprit. I could search out other threads mentioning how Coldfusion is a development platform of the past and it is basically scaled for small to medium sized sites.
Show me some benchmarking studies and THEN I'll consider what you say as factual. I probably do not disagree with you in that technologies like ASP and Coldfusion probably shouldn't be used on huge sites, but I wouldn't go saying "Coldfusion is bad. ASP is good."
Coldfusion and ASP are virtually identical in how they work. If you say Coldfusion is poor, then ASP is as well. It can very well be argued that neither of these should be used are large sites and one should switch to JSP or some such technology.
I'm guessing that PalmGear's problems have little to do with the scripting language they went with. I have a feeling it has much more to do with their database and server network.
As for sites using ColdFusion, here are a few (and they all seem to work MUCH faster than PalmGear)
http://www.fao.com/
http://www.autobytel.com/
http://www.casio.com/
ASP tends to be more popular since a lot of back-end web developers come from Windows/Visual Basic backgrounds and it is just easier to learn ASP for them.
__________________
We're all naked if you turn us inside out.
-David Byrne
|